COMPARATIVE STUDY INTO ARCHAIC SOFTWARE INTEGRATION BASED ON NATO S4 SOFTWARE LIBRARY

This study aims to research different integration strategies for a legacy software suite, focusing on comparing Command Line Interface (CLI) and web API methods. The research evaluates these approaches using both objective metrics, such as CPU/RAM usage and response times, and subjective metrics, including client satisfaction. Results showed that CLI integration handles a higher volume of lowcomputation- time requests more efficiently, while RAM usage was similar across all requests and integrations. Response times were marginally longer for the web API integration, but the differences became less significant for more complex requests. Feedback from the client indicated a lack of strong preference, however the importance of efficient CPU and RAM usage was emphasised due to the crucial need for battery efficiency. Although the integrations in this study exhibited minimal differences, these findings will provide valuable insight for future integration projects and suggest possible avenues for further research in this domain.

Publication Details

Journal
Ajakirjad. Journals by UT
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15157/st.vi24.25502
Primary Topic
Usability and User Interface Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY INTO ARCHAIC SOFTWARE INTEGRATION BASED ON NATO S4 SOFTWARE LIBRARY

Ajakirjad. Journals by UT
Usability and User Interface Design
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY INTO ARCHAIC SOFTWARE INTEGRATION BASED ON NATO S4 SOFTWARE LIBRARY

article en

Abstract

This study aims to research different integration strategies for a legacy software suite, focusing on comparing Command Line Interface (CLI) and web API methods. The research evaluates these approaches using both objective metrics, such as CPU/RAM usage and response times, and subjective metrics, including client satisfaction. Results showed that CLI integration handles a higher volume of lowcomputation- time requests more efficiently, while RAM usage was similar across all requests and integrations. Response times were marginally longer for the web API integration, but the differences became less significant for more complex requests. Feedback from the client indicated a lack of strong preference, however the importance of efficient CPU and RAM usage was emphasised due to the crucial need for battery efficiency. Although the integrations in this study exhibited minimal differences, these findings will provide valuable insight for future integration projects and suggest possible avenues for further research in this domain.

Ajakirjad. Journals by UT
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Usability and User Interface Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE STUDY INTO ARCHAIC SOFTWARE INTEGRATION BASED ON NATO S4 SOFTWARE LIBRARY · Ajakirjad. Journals by UT (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS