Correlation of estimated vs. direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with smoking status.
<p>A. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. B. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. C. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. D. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. E. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. F. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. G. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. H. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. I. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. J. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. K. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. L. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. Cor, correlation coefficient; MAE, mean absolute error; R<sup>2</sup>, correlation coefficient; RMSE, root mean square error; TG, triglyceride. The dots indicate the individual samples colored according to TG level. The color scale indicates individuals. SI conversion factors: To convert cholesterol to mmol/L, values were multiplied by 0.0259.</p> <p>(DOCX)</p>
Publication Details
- Journal
- Figshare
- Published
- 2024-09-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309002.s002
- Primary Topic
- Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00