Correlation of estimated vs. direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with smoking status.

<p>A. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. B. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. C. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. D. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. E. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. F. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. G. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. H. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. I. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. J. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. K. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. L. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. Cor, correlation coefficient; MAE, mean absolute error; R<sup>2</sup>, correlation coefficient; RMSE, root mean square error; TG, triglyceride. The dots indicate the individual samples colored according to TG level. The color scale indicates individuals. SI conversion factors: To convert cholesterol to mmol/L, values were multiplied by 0.0259.</p> <p>(DOCX)</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309002.s002
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of estimated vs. direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with smoking status.

Figshare
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Correlation of estimated vs. direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with smoking status.

article en

Abstract

<p>A. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. B. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. C. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for never smokers. D. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. E. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. F. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for former smokers. G. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. H. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. I. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for current smokers. J. The Sampson equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. K. The Martin equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. L. The Friedewald equation vs. direct LDL-C for electronic cigarette smokers. Cor, correlation coefficient; MAE, mean absolute error; R<sup>2</sup>, correlation coefficient; RMSE, root mean square error; TG, triglyceride. The dots indicate the individual samples colored according to TG level. The color scale indicates individuals. SI conversion factors: To convert cholesterol to mmol/L, values were multiplied by 0.0259.</p> <p>(DOCX)</p>

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correlation of estimated vs. direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with smoking status. · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS