Characteristics of Dissolved Carbon Loss on Loess Slopes and Its Response to Soil and Water Conservation Measures

[Objective] The implementation of soil and water conservation measures has led to a notable reduction in the loss of soil carbon pools, while simultaneously facilitating effective control of soil erosion. However, there is a paucity of systematic understanding of the processes of carbon loss, flux characteristics and the factors that influence them under different soil and water conservation measures. [Methods] In this study, a comparative analysis of the characteristics and influencing factors associated with the loss of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and inorganic carbon (DIC) from loess slopes under different soil and water conservation measures was conducted. These measures included terraces, grasslands, upper terraces and lower grasslands, and the upper terraces and lower bare soil. To this end, a simulated rainfall test in the field was employed to quantify the benefits of the above-mentioned soil and water conservation measures in reducing the loss of dissolved carbon from the slopes. [Results] The dissolved carbon concentration on the slope surface under each soil and water conservation measure remained relatively constant throughout the rainfall process. However, the flux of dissolved carbon loss was significantly lower than that observed on bare ground (p<0.05). Furthermore, the loss of dissolved inorganic carbon contributed to 79.5%—83.1% of the total carbon loss. The retention benefits of grassland, the upper terraces and lower grasslands, the upper terraces and lower bare soil measures for dissolved carbon on slopes were 76.9%, 56.3%, 47.6% and 18.0%, respectively. The volume of flow production on the slope surface was identified as the determining factor affecting the flux of dissolved carbon loss. Furthermore, the flux of carbon loss was found to be significantly positively correlated with the flow volume. [Conclusion] This study enhances our understanding of the mechanisms through which soil carbon loss is mitigated by diverse soil and water conservation measures. It offers a scientific foundation for evaluating the carbon sink benefits of soil and water conservation on the slopes of the Loess Plateau.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.02.017
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics of Dissolved Carbon Loss on Loess Slopes and Its Response to Soil and Water Conservation Measures

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Characteristics of Dissolved Carbon Loss on Loess Slopes and Its Response to Soil and Water Conservation Measures

article en

Abstract

[Objective] The implementation of soil and water conservation measures has led to a notable reduction in the loss of soil carbon pools, while simultaneously facilitating effective control of soil erosion. However, there is a paucity of systematic understanding of the processes of carbon loss, flux characteristics and the factors that influence them under different soil and water conservation measures. [Methods] In this study, a comparative analysis of the characteristics and influencing factors associated with the loss of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and inorganic carbon (DIC) from loess slopes under different soil and water conservation measures was conducted. These measures included terraces, grasslands, upper terraces and lower grasslands, and the upper terraces and lower bare soil. To this end, a simulated rainfall test in the field was employed to quantify the benefits of the above-mentioned soil and water conservation measures in reducing the loss of dissolved carbon from the slopes. [Results] The dissolved carbon concentration on the slope surface under each soil and water conservation measure remained relatively constant throughout the rainfall process. However, the flux of dissolved carbon loss was significantly lower than that observed on bare ground (p<0.05). Furthermore, the loss of dissolved inorganic carbon contributed to 79.5%—83.1% of the total carbon loss. The retention benefits of grassland, the upper terraces and lower grasslands, the upper terraces and lower bare soil measures for dissolved carbon on slopes were 76.9%, 56.3%, 47.6% and 18.0%, respectively. The volume of flow production on the slope surface was identified as the determining factor affecting the flux of dissolved carbon loss. Furthermore, the flux of carbon loss was found to be significantly positively correlated with the flow volume. [Conclusion] This study enhances our understanding of the mechanisms through which soil carbon loss is mitigated by diverse soil and water conservation measures. It offers a scientific foundation for evaluating the carbon sink benefits of soil and water conservation on the slopes of the Loess Plateau.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xi'an University of Technology (CN), Institute of Earth Environment (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.