Impaired transmural propagation aggravates endoepicardial delays.

<p>To study in a simple model how adding intermediate layers (with propagation in the inner layers) would affect endoepicardial delays, we created four configurations of a ladder-shaped 2D model (0.1 mm resolution; 501 by 4 nodes; <i>right panels</i>). Endocardial conductivity was 4 mS/cm, transmural conductivity was 0.5 mS/cm, and epicardial was varied between 0.5 and 4 mS/cm. In the model with 4 layers, the top two layers were considered epicardium, and the bottom two layers were considered endocardium. Endoepicardial connections were spaced every 1, 2, 3 or 4 nodes. Left-to-right propagation was simulated and the endoepicardial delay (mean ± standard deviation) was calculated in the middle third of the tissue. <i>Left panel</i>: Endoepicardial delay as a function of the epicardial conductivity for different configurations. The fully coupled 4-layer model had the lowest delay. Removing propagation in the inner layers increased the delay. Extending the spacing between the endoepicardial connections resulted in a further prolongation of the delay.</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314342.s002
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impaired transmural propagation aggravates endoepicardial delays.

Figshare
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Impaired transmural propagation aggravates endoepicardial delays.

article en

Abstract

<p>To study in a simple model how adding intermediate layers (with propagation in the inner layers) would affect endoepicardial delays, we created four configurations of a ladder-shaped 2D model (0.1 mm resolution; 501 by 4 nodes; <i>right panels</i>). Endocardial conductivity was 4 mS/cm, transmural conductivity was 0.5 mS/cm, and epicardial was varied between 0.5 and 4 mS/cm. In the model with 4 layers, the top two layers were considered epicardium, and the bottom two layers were considered endocardium. Endoepicardial connections were spaced every 1, 2, 3 or 4 nodes. Left-to-right propagation was simulated and the endoepicardial delay (mean ± standard deviation) was calculated in the middle third of the tissue. <i>Left panel</i>: Endoepicardial delay as a function of the epicardial conductivity for different configurations. The fully coupled 4-layer model had the lowest delay. Removing propagation in the inner layers increased the delay. Extending the spacing between the endoepicardial connections resulted in a further prolongation of the delay.</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.