Impaired transmural propagation aggravates endoepicardial delays.
<p>To study in a simple model how adding intermediate layers (with propagation in the inner layers) would affect endoepicardial delays, we created four configurations of a ladder-shaped 2D model (0.1 mm resolution; 501 by 4 nodes; <i>right panels</i>). Endocardial conductivity was 4 mS/cm, transmural conductivity was 0.5 mS/cm, and epicardial was varied between 0.5 and 4 mS/cm. In the model with 4 layers, the top two layers were considered epicardium, and the bottom two layers were considered endocardium. Endoepicardial connections were spaced every 1, 2, 3 or 4 nodes. Left-to-right propagation was simulated and the endoepicardial delay (mean ± standard deviation) was calculated in the middle third of the tissue. <i>Left panel</i>: Endoepicardial delay as a function of the epicardial conductivity for different configurations. The fully coupled 4-layer model had the lowest delay. Removing propagation in the inner layers increased the delay. Extending the spacing between the endoepicardial connections resulted in a further prolongation of the delay.</p> <p>(PDF)</p>
Publication Details
- Journal
- Figshare
- Published
- 2024-11-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314342.s002
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00