PRISMA 2020 checklist.

<div> Objective The relationship among body mass index (BMI), postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this association using a meta-analysis. Method We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to February 25, 2024. Patients were classified into underweight (<18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), normal weight (18.5–25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and overweight (≥25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) groups based on BMI categories. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Additionally, exploratory sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed. Results Twenty-two studies involving 41,144 patients with gastric cancer were included for quantitative analysis. Preoperative underweight (odds ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–1.55; <i>P</i> = 0.024) and overweight (OR: 1.19; 95%CI: 1.09–1.30; <i>P</i> <0.001) were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Furthermore, preoperative underweight was associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; 95%CI: 1.28–1.53; <i>P</i> <0.001), whereas preoperative overweight was associated with better over-survival (HR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.73–0.91; <i>P</i> <0.001). Furthermore, preoperative underweight was not associated with disease-free survival (HR: 1.48; 95%CI: 0.97–2.26; <i>P</i> = 0.069), whereas preoperative overweight was associated with longer disease-free survival (HR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.70–0.91; <i>P</i> = 0.001). In terms of specific postoperative complications, preoperative underweight was associated with an increased risk of septic shock (OR: 3.40; 95%CI: 1.26–9.17; <i>P</i> = 0.015) and a reduced risk of fever (OR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18–0.83; <i>P</i> = 0.014). Preoperative overweight was associated with an increased risk of wound infections (OR: 1.78; 95%CI: 1.08–2.93; <i>P</i> = 0.023), intestinal fistula (OR: 5.23; 95%CI: 1.93–14.21; <i>P</i> = 0.001), arrhythmia (OR: 6.38; 95%CI: 1.70–24.01; <i>P</i> = 0.006), and pancreatic fistula (OR: 3.37; 95%CI: 1.14–9.96; <i>P</i> = 0.028). Conclusion This study revealed that both preoperative underweight and overweight status were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Moreover, the postoperative survival outcomes were significantly better in overweight compared to that of underweight patients. Trial registration <b>Registration:</b><a href="https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-8-0004/" target="_blank">INPLASY202480004</a>. </div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317985.s001
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRISMA 2020 checklist.

Figshare
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

PRISMA 2020 checklist.

article en

Abstract

<div> Objective The relationship among body mass index (BMI), postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this association using a meta-analysis. Method We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to February 25, 2024. Patients were classified into underweight (<18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), normal weight (18.5–25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and overweight (≥25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) groups based on BMI categories. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Additionally, exploratory sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed. Results Twenty-two studies involving 41,144 patients with gastric cancer were included for quantitative analysis. Preoperative underweight (odds ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–1.55; <i>P</i> = 0.024) and overweight (OR: 1.19; 95%CI: 1.09–1.30; <i>P</i> <0.001) were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Furthermore, preoperative underweight was associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; 95%CI: 1.28–1.53; <i>P</i> <0.001), whereas preoperative overweight was associated with better over-survival (HR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.73–0.91; <i>P</i> <0.001). Furthermore, preoperative underweight was not associated with disease-free survival (HR: 1.48; 95%CI: 0.97–2.26; <i>P</i> = 0.069), whereas preoperative overweight was associated with longer disease-free survival (HR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.70–0.91; <i>P</i> = 0.001). In terms of specific postoperative complications, preoperative underweight was associated with an increased risk of septic shock (OR: 3.40; 95%CI: 1.26–9.17; <i>P</i> = 0.015) and a reduced risk of fever (OR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18–0.83; <i>P</i> = 0.014). Preoperative overweight was associated with an increased risk of wound infections (OR: 1.78; 95%CI: 1.08–2.93; <i>P</i> = 0.023), intestinal fistula (OR: 5.23; 95%CI: 1.93–14.21; <i>P</i> = 0.001), arrhythmia (OR: 6.38; 95%CI: 1.70–24.01; <i>P</i> = 0.006), and pancreatic fistula (OR: 3.37; 95%CI: 1.14–9.96; <i>P</i> = 0.028). Conclusion This study revealed that both preoperative underweight and overweight status were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Moreover, the postoperative survival outcomes were significantly better in overweight compared to that of underweight patients. Trial registration <b>Registration:</b><a href="https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-8-0004/" target="_blank">INPLASY202480004</a>. </div>

Figshare
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PRISMA 2020 checklist. · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS