Interpretation of Kappa Statistic. Guidelines by Altman (1991), where a κ-value 0.20 is considered poor agreement, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1 very good.

Publication Details

Journal: Figshare
Published: 2025-03-19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318700.s005
Primary Topic: Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Interpretation of Kappa Statistic. Guidelines by Altman (1991), where a κ-value 0.20 is considered poor agreement, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1 very good.

Mar 19, 2025

Figshare

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

article

Interpretation of Kappa Statistic. Guidelines by Altman (1991), where a κ-value 0.20 is considered poor agreement, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1 very good.

March 19, 2025article en

Abstract

Interpretation of Kappa Statistic. Guidelines by Altman (1991), where a κ-value 0.20 is considered poor agreement, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1 very good.

Figshare

No poverty

Openalex Percentile: Top 57%

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

DOI Source OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interpretation of Kappa Statistic. Guidelines by Altman (1991), where a κ-value 0.20 is considered poor agreement, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1 very good. · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS