GBS-Div software description and functionalities.

<div><p>Many species are defined in the <i>Musa</i> section within its natural diversification area in Southeast Asia. However, their actual number remains debated as botanical characterisation, distribution and intraspecific variability are still poorly known, compromising their preservation and their exploitation as crop wild relatives of cultivated forms. To address the underexplored <i>Musa</i> diversity in mainland Southeast Asia, at the northern edge of the natural range, 208 specimens were collected in Vietnam, Laos and China, mainly belonging to <i>Musa balbisiana</i>, <i>M</i>. <i>itinerans</i>, <i>M</i>. <i>acuminata</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>yunnanensis</i>. Data on location, morphology, environment and local knowledge were recorded, and leaf samples collected for high-throughput genotyping. This study combines geographical, morphological, and genomic diversity to clarify the taxonomic classification. The collected species exhibit highly distinctive morphologies and genomes, just as they differ in ranges and life traits. Intraspecific genomic diversity was also observed, although not necessarily morphologically perceptible. Mainland Southeast Asia is confirmed as a primary diversification centre for the <i>Musa</i> section. The diversity observed is only partially represented in major international <i>ex situ</i> collections, calling for their urgent enrichment and the promotion of <i>in situ</i> management procedures, for the protection of these threatened species and to better harness their potential in breeding programmes. Although considered wild, the species studied are all affected to varying extents by human use. <i>Musa yunnanensis</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>acuminata</i> subsp. <i>burmannica</i> are the most strictly wild forms, with spontaneous interspecific hybrids first described in this study. Although gathered as fodder, they were only occasionally dispersed outside their endemic zones. <i>Musa itinerans</i> is not cultivated <i>per se</i>, but natural populations are widely exploited, leading to a geographically structured diversity. The diversity of <i>M</i>. <i>balbisiana</i> is widely distributed and geographically structured by human activities. This species should be regarded as domesticated. These various stages, from simple opportunistic gathering to true domestication, shed light on the evolutionary history of today’s cultivated varieties.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307592.s002
Primary Topic
Banana Cultivation and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GBS-Div software description and functionalities.

Figshare
Banana Cultivation and Research
article

GBS-Div software description and functionalities.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Many species are defined in the <i>Musa</i> section within its natural diversification area in Southeast Asia. However, their actual number remains debated as botanical characterisation, distribution and intraspecific variability are still poorly known, compromising their preservation and their exploitation as crop wild relatives of cultivated forms. To address the underexplored <i>Musa</i> diversity in mainland Southeast Asia, at the northern edge of the natural range, 208 specimens were collected in Vietnam, Laos and China, mainly belonging to <i>Musa balbisiana</i>, <i>M</i>. <i>itinerans</i>, <i>M</i>. <i>acuminata</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>yunnanensis</i>. Data on location, morphology, environment and local knowledge were recorded, and leaf samples collected for high-throughput genotyping. This study combines geographical, morphological, and genomic diversity to clarify the taxonomic classification. The collected species exhibit highly distinctive morphologies and genomes, just as they differ in ranges and life traits. Intraspecific genomic diversity was also observed, although not necessarily morphologically perceptible. Mainland Southeast Asia is confirmed as a primary diversification centre for the <i>Musa</i> section. The diversity observed is only partially represented in major international <i>ex situ</i> collections, calling for their urgent enrichment and the promotion of <i>in situ</i> management procedures, for the protection of these threatened species and to better harness their potential in breeding programmes. Although considered wild, the species studied are all affected to varying extents by human use. <i>Musa yunnanensis</i> and <i>M</i>. <i>acuminata</i> subsp. <i>burmannica</i> are the most strictly wild forms, with spontaneous interspecific hybrids first described in this study. Although gathered as fodder, they were only occasionally dispersed outside their endemic zones. <i>Musa itinerans</i> is not cultivated <i>per se</i>, but natural populations are widely exploited, leading to a geographically structured diversity. The diversity of <i>M</i>. <i>balbisiana</i> is widely distributed and geographically structured by human activities. This species should be regarded as domesticated. These various stages, from simple opportunistic gathering to true domestication, shed light on the evolutionary history of today’s cultivated varieties.</p></div>

Figshare
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Banana Cultivation and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.