Risk of bias and quality assessment of studies.

<div><p>Background</p><p>Stakeholder engagement is widely considered democratic, transparent, and essential in the shared decision-making process for improving health services. However, the integrated evidence of stakeholders’ engagement activities in maternal and newborn health (MNH) services in the context of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is lacking. Therefore, this review aims to generate synthesised evidence of different practices for stakeholder engagements, characteristics of stakeholder engagements and outcomes of stakeholder engagements in improving the MNH services uptake and delivery.</p><p>Methods</p><p>The systematic review reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The literature was searched in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Science Direct and Scopus databases. The identified records were screened using Covidence software, and data were extracted from included records using a predefined template. The mixed methods appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The spectrum of stakeholder engagement provided by the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) was used as a guiding framework for synthesising the evidence related to stakeholder engagement.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 1473 records were identified through the initial search after removing the duplicates. Twenty-six studies were included in the final review. The review results related to service users and other stakeholders’ engagement are presented under three overarching themes: (i) Methods and contexts of stakeholders’ engagement, (ii) Outcomes of stakeholders’ engagement, and (iii) Facilitators and barriers to stakeholders’ engagement.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Various participatory approaches were utilised to engage the service users and other stakeholders in improving MNH service uptake and delivery. A wide range of service user- and provider-led outcomes were identified due to stakeholder engagement.</p><p>Trial registration</p><p><b>PROSPERO registration number:</b><a href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022314613" target="_blank">CRD42022314613</a>.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309888.s005
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of bias and quality assessment of studies.

Figshare
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Risk of bias and quality assessment of studies.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Background</p><p>Stakeholder engagement is widely considered democratic, transparent, and essential in the shared decision-making process for improving health services. However, the integrated evidence of stakeholders’ engagement activities in maternal and newborn health (MNH) services in the context of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is lacking. Therefore, this review aims to generate synthesised evidence of different practices for stakeholder engagements, characteristics of stakeholder engagements and outcomes of stakeholder engagements in improving the MNH services uptake and delivery.</p><p>Methods</p><p>The systematic review reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The literature was searched in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Science Direct and Scopus databases. The identified records were screened using Covidence software, and data were extracted from included records using a predefined template. The mixed methods appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The spectrum of stakeholder engagement provided by the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) was used as a guiding framework for synthesising the evidence related to stakeholder engagement.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 1473 records were identified through the initial search after removing the duplicates. Twenty-six studies were included in the final review. The review results related to service users and other stakeholders’ engagement are presented under three overarching themes: (i) Methods and contexts of stakeholders’ engagement, (ii) Outcomes of stakeholders’ engagement, and (iii) Facilitators and barriers to stakeholders’ engagement.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Various participatory approaches were utilised to engage the service users and other stakeholders in improving MNH service uptake and delivery. A wide range of service user- and provider-led outcomes were identified due to stakeholder engagement.</p><p>Trial registration</p><p><b>PROSPERO registration number:</b><a href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022314613" target="_blank">CRD42022314613</a>.</p></div>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risk of bias and quality assessment of studies. · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS