S1 Text -

<p><b>Including: Table A.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for aseptic loosening. <b>Table B.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for peri-prosthetic fracture. <b>Table C.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for implant wear. <b>Table D.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for malalignment. <b>Table E.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for dislocation or subluxation. <b>Table F.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for pain. <b>Table G.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for infection. <b>Table H.</b> Description of the studied sample and revision rate for any other reason(s). <b>Table I.</b> Monobloc acetabular component—all-cause revision hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table J.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for aseptic loosening hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table K.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for peri-prosthetic fracture hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table L.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for implant wear hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table M.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for malalignment hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table N.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for dislocation or subluxation hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table O.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for pain hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table P.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for infection hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table Q.</b> Monobloc acetabular component-Revision for any other reason(s) hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene cup. <b>Table R.</b> Modular acetabular component—all-cause revision hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table S.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for aseptic loosening hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table T.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for peri-prosthetic fracture hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table U.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for implant wear hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table V.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for malalignment hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table W.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for dislocation or subluxation hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table X.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for pain hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table Y.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for infection hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table Z.</b> Modular acetabular component-Revision for any other reason(s) hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by time point from primary procedure-Reference: Implant with cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner. <b>Table AA.</b> Registry studies identified in MEDLINE and Embase search on 1 March 2023. <b>Fig A.</b> PRISMA flow diagram. <b>Fig B.</b> Risk of revision for aseptic loosening by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig C.</b> Risk of revision for aseptic loosening by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig D.</b> Risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig E.</b> Risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig F.</b> Risk of revision for implant wear by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig G.</b> Risk of revision for implant wear by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig H.</b> Risk of revision for malignment by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig I.</b> Risk of revision for malignment by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig J.</b> Risk of revision for dislocation or subluxation by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig K.</b> Risk of revision for dislocation or subluxation by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig L.</b> Risk of revision for pain by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig M.</b> Risk of revision for pain by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig N.</b> Risk of revision for infection by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig O.</b> Risk of revision for infection by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig P.</b> Risk of revision for any other reason(s) by head and cup types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene cup). <b>Fig Q.</b> Risk of revision for any other reason(s) by head and liner types (Reference: Cobalt chrome head with highly crosslinked polyethylene liner). <b>Fig R.</b> Modular acetabular component-all-cause risk of revision for implants with delta ceramic head and highly crosslinked polyethylenE (HCLPE) and oxidised zirconium head and HCPLE liner.</p> <p>(DOCX)</p>