Search strategies.

<div> The protracted Syrian conflict has devastated healthcare infrastructure across Syria with impacts on both the conflict and non-conflict related surgical needs of patients. This review summarises the literature related to peripheral limb surgery performed in Syria between March 2011 to January 2024 to determine the influence of the conflict on surgical capacity and provision. A systematic review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was performed using six academic and one grey literature database. Studies that included clinical-epidemiological descriptions of procedures in orthopaedic, vascular and plastic surgery were included for quantitative and narrative analysis. The search resulted in 3951 papers, of which 7 met inclusion criteria. Studies varied widely in sample size (range: 25–3835; total: 7749), design, and outcomes. Procedures spanned orthopaedic (1285, 31%), vascular (741, 18%), and plastic surgery (2145, 51%), totalling 4171 cases. Common procedures included wound management (51%), external fixation (26%), and lower limb amputation (15%). There was prevalence of emergency over elective surgery, performed in rudimentary, secret field hospitals by practitioners lacking formal specialist training or aid-workers. Inadequate documentation and incomplete data capture, due to the conflict, hindered the availability of high-quality, comprehensive surgical datasets within Syria. The focus on emergency surgery is a natural consequence of the prioritisation required with conflict-related pathology, however poor resource availability resulted in challenges in providing basic surgical care. Further research is needed to address gaps in evidence regarding the current state of surgery, training needs, and the quality of care provided. </div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004116.s001
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Search strategies.

Figshare
Health and Conflict Studies
article

Search strategies.

article en

Abstract

<div> The protracted Syrian conflict has devastated healthcare infrastructure across Syria with impacts on both the conflict and non-conflict related surgical needs of patients. This review summarises the literature related to peripheral limb surgery performed in Syria between March 2011 to January 2024 to determine the influence of the conflict on surgical capacity and provision. A systematic review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was performed using six academic and one grey literature database. Studies that included clinical-epidemiological descriptions of procedures in orthopaedic, vascular and plastic surgery were included for quantitative and narrative analysis. The search resulted in 3951 papers, of which 7 met inclusion criteria. Studies varied widely in sample size (range: 25–3835; total: 7749), design, and outcomes. Procedures spanned orthopaedic (1285, 31%), vascular (741, 18%), and plastic surgery (2145, 51%), totalling 4171 cases. Common procedures included wound management (51%), external fixation (26%), and lower limb amputation (15%). There was prevalence of emergency over elective surgery, performed in rudimentary, secret field hospitals by practitioners lacking formal specialist training or aid-workers. Inadequate documentation and incomplete data capture, due to the conflict, hindered the availability of high-quality, comprehensive surgical datasets within Syria. The focus on emergency surgery is a natural consequence of the prioritisation required with conflict-related pathology, however poor resource availability resulted in challenges in providing basic surgical care. Further research is needed to address gaps in evidence regarding the current state of surgery, training needs, and the quality of care provided. </div>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Health and Conflict Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.