Acceptability transcripts.

<div> Working with community health workers is a vital strategy to improve health at a community level in low- and middle-income countries. Our study assessed the acceptability of a community health worker-led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe. The intervention consisted of face-to-face individual educational sessions and support visits, delivered by trained community health workers at either the patient’s home or the primary care clinic. We embedded this qualitative study within a cluster randomized trial, which assessed the intervention’s effectiveness. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 3 community health nurses and 25 patients as well as 3 focus group discussions with CHWs. We analyzed the data manually using the deductive analysis method based on a coding framework structured according to the Theoretical Framework for Acceptability. Participants expressed optimism and anxiety regarding the intervention. All community nurses and CHWs believed that the intervention was effective in improving adherence to recommended lifestyle modifications and overall health outcomes among the patients. Patients felt that the intervention was ethically sound. All community health workers and community nurses reported a clear understanding of the intervention’s goals and methods. Some patients felt that some aspects of the intervention needed to be improved. There was a consensus that the benefits associated with the intervention outweighed the costs. Some patients reported that they were not confident in participating in the intervention because some of the recommended lifestyle modifications were beyond their control. Whilst there were positive sentiments regarding the intervention’s potential to empower patients and improve health outcomes, challenges related to patients’ perceived burdens must be addressed. Future iterations of the intervention should focus on enhancing support for CHWs and ensuring that patients’ preferences are catered for. </div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003541.s002
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability transcripts.

Figshare
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Acceptability transcripts.

article en

Abstract

<div> Working with community health workers is a vital strategy to improve health at a community level in low- and middle-income countries. Our study assessed the acceptability of a community health worker-led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe. The intervention consisted of face-to-face individual educational sessions and support visits, delivered by trained community health workers at either the patient’s home or the primary care clinic. We embedded this qualitative study within a cluster randomized trial, which assessed the intervention’s effectiveness. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 3 community health nurses and 25 patients as well as 3 focus group discussions with CHWs. We analyzed the data manually using the deductive analysis method based on a coding framework structured according to the Theoretical Framework for Acceptability. Participants expressed optimism and anxiety regarding the intervention. All community nurses and CHWs believed that the intervention was effective in improving adherence to recommended lifestyle modifications and overall health outcomes among the patients. Patients felt that the intervention was ethically sound. All community health workers and community nurses reported a clear understanding of the intervention’s goals and methods. Some patients felt that some aspects of the intervention needed to be improved. There was a consensus that the benefits associated with the intervention outweighed the costs. Some patients reported that they were not confident in participating in the intervention because some of the recommended lifestyle modifications were beyond their control. Whilst there were positive sentiments regarding the intervention’s potential to empower patients and improve health outcomes, challenges related to patients’ perceived burdens must be addressed. Future iterations of the intervention should focus on enhancing support for CHWs and ensuring that patients’ preferences are catered for. </div>

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.