Numerical simulation study on the pressure relief and anti-scour effects of multi-seam coal mining

Existing studies on pressure relief and anti-scour in multi-seam coal mining mostly rely on simplified numerical models to analyze the mining-induced stress distribution of multiple coal seams, which makes it difficult to realistically reflect the complex geological conditions and the physical-mechanical interactions between coal seams. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic characterization of the combined influence mechanisms of goaf areas and remaining coal pillars. To address these issues, based on the engineering background of mining four coal seams in Kuangou Coal Mine, this study used numerical simulation to investigate the impact of complex spatial structures such as multi-seam goaf areas and remaining coal pillars on the mining of underlying coal seams. The results showed that: when mining a single coal seam, there was obvious stress concentration below the remaining coal pillar, and a significant pressure relief effect below the goaf area. Under the superimposed influence of mining multiple seams, the stress concentration at the overlapping boundaries of multiple goaf areas further increased. If there were goaf areas above and below the remaining coal pillar, its stress concentration significantly decreased, resulting in a stress reduction in the coal seam below the projection of the remaining pillar, thus causing pressure relief. The protective pressure relief effect of goaf areas and the stress concentration effect of coal pillars decreased as the spacing between coal seams increased. According to the coal seam stress concentration coefficient, the coal seam protection pressure relief zones and stress concentration zones were delineated: when the stress concentration coefficient was (0,1], (1,2], (2,3], and (3, ∞), they corresponded respectively to pressure relief or no influence zone, weak influence zone, moderate influence zone, and strong influence zone. Electromagnetic radiation and acoustic emission energy in the delineated areas were tested using an electroseismic vector monitoring instrument, and the results verified the accuracy of the delineated pressure relief and stress concentration zones.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2025020014
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical simulation study on the pressure relief and anti-scour effects of multi-seam coal mining

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Numerical simulation study on the pressure relief and anti-scour effects of multi-seam coal mining

article en

Abstract

Existing studies on pressure relief and anti-scour in multi-seam coal mining mostly rely on simplified numerical models to analyze the mining-induced stress distribution of multiple coal seams, which makes it difficult to realistically reflect the complex geological conditions and the physical-mechanical interactions between coal seams. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic characterization of the combined influence mechanisms of goaf areas and remaining coal pillars. To address these issues, based on the engineering background of mining four coal seams in Kuangou Coal Mine, this study used numerical simulation to investigate the impact of complex spatial structures such as multi-seam goaf areas and remaining coal pillars on the mining of underlying coal seams. The results showed that: when mining a single coal seam, there was obvious stress concentration below the remaining coal pillar, and a significant pressure relief effect below the goaf area. Under the superimposed influence of mining multiple seams, the stress concentration at the overlapping boundaries of multiple goaf areas further increased. If there were goaf areas above and below the remaining coal pillar, its stress concentration significantly decreased, resulting in a stress reduction in the coal seam below the projection of the remaining pillar, thus causing pressure relief. The protective pressure relief effect of goaf areas and the stress concentration effect of coal pillars decreased as the spacing between coal seams increased. According to the coal seam stress concentration coefficient, the coal seam protection pressure relief zones and stress concentration zones were delineated: when the stress concentration coefficient was (0,1], (1,2], (2,3], and (3, ∞), they corresponded respectively to pressure relief or no influence zone, weak influence zone, moderate influence zone, and strong influence zone. Electromagnetic radiation and acoustic emission energy in the delineated areas were tested using an electroseismic vector monitoring instrument, and the results verified the accuracy of the delineated pressure relief and stress concentration zones.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Nano Energy (South Africa) (ZA), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.