Individual model fits and probability normalizing weights.

<p><b>(a-c)</b> Each individual’s behavioral choices on Info: ‘safe’ (blue) and Info: ‘risky’ (red) trials were overlaid with their predicted choices (solid lines) based on the Hybrid model. For each participant, P(safe) is binned and averaged based on the expected value difference between the safe and risky gambles. <b>(d-f)</b> Estimates of normalizing weights between decision computations are shown for each group. While there existed individual variation across groups, a majority of those with dACC or insula lesions showed greater ω<sub>follow</sub> weights than OCU weights (ω<sub>utility</sub>). Estimates shown are from the Hybrid model (see <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012602#sec006" target="_blank">Materials and Methods</a> for parameter estimation details).</p> <p>(PDF)</p>