Fluid–solid coupling productivity analysis of multi-stage fractured horizontal wells in shale reservoirs

Starting from the micro/macro dynamics of seepage behavior, stress-sensitive experiments are conducted to investigate the fluid–solid coupling and fluid flow law in shale gas reservoirs. These experiments elucidate the interaction between micro and macroscopic effective stress based on the dynamic behavior of seepage. By applying the principle of effective stress, a nonlinear seepage mathematical model for matrix–fracture porosity and permeability in shale reservoirs is established, considering multi-scale fluid–solid coupling effects such as slip diffusion, desorption, gas flow, and shale deformation. Based on the multi-zone coupled seepage physical model of a shale gas reservoir, a fluid–solid coupling productivity model for shale gas horizontal wells is established. This model considers the impact of reservoir deformation on shale matrix–fracture porosity and permeability. Additionally, it reveals the nonlinear seepage law of multistage fractured horizontal wells and analyzes factors influencing productivity. Stress sensitivity experiments on matrix rock samples and fracture rock samples indicate that the stress sensitivity of matrix rock samples is stronger than that of fracture rock samples. The research shows that cumulative gas production, accounting for the influence of fluid–solid coupling on shale gas seepage, differs by approximately 14% compared to when it is not considered. The difference is mainly attributed to the fluid–solid coupling in the fracture network of the reconstruction area. Analyzing fluid–solid coupling parameters reveals that larger elastic modulus results in stronger resistance to deformation, leading to a weaker fluid–solid coupling effect and decreased gas production. Shale skeleton shrinkage deformation during desorption makes the fluid–solid coupling effect more pronounced, though it slightly reduces gas production. Higher Poisson’s ratio and Biot coefficient increase the deformation sensitivity of the shale reservoir and decrease the resistance to deformation in the fracture network zone, resulting in a more significant fluid–solid coupling effect and decreased gas production. As initial porosity increases, the absolute value of the fluid–solid coupling stress sensitivity coefficient decreases gradually, significantly enhancing the fluid–solid coupling effect characterized by the permeability model. The simulation results of the model align with actual field data, showing that gas production follows an “L-shaped” decline pattern with a coincidence rate exceeding 70%, verifying the model’s accuracy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2024.03.26.001
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fluid–solid coupling productivity analysis of multi-stage fractured horizontal wells in shale reservoirs

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Fluid–solid coupling productivity analysis of multi-stage fractured horizontal wells in shale reservoirs

article en

Abstract

Starting from the micro/macro dynamics of seepage behavior, stress-sensitive experiments are conducted to investigate the fluid–solid coupling and fluid flow law in shale gas reservoirs. These experiments elucidate the interaction between micro and macroscopic effective stress based on the dynamic behavior of seepage. By applying the principle of effective stress, a nonlinear seepage mathematical model for matrix–fracture porosity and permeability in shale reservoirs is established, considering multi-scale fluid–solid coupling effects such as slip diffusion, desorption, gas flow, and shale deformation. Based on the multi-zone coupled seepage physical model of a shale gas reservoir, a fluid–solid coupling productivity model for shale gas horizontal wells is established. This model considers the impact of reservoir deformation on shale matrix–fracture porosity and permeability. Additionally, it reveals the nonlinear seepage law of multistage fractured horizontal wells and analyzes factors influencing productivity. Stress sensitivity experiments on matrix rock samples and fracture rock samples indicate that the stress sensitivity of matrix rock samples is stronger than that of fracture rock samples. The research shows that cumulative gas production, accounting for the influence of fluid–solid coupling on shale gas seepage, differs by approximately 14% compared to when it is not considered. The difference is mainly attributed to the fluid–solid coupling in the fracture network of the reconstruction area. Analyzing fluid–solid coupling parameters reveals that larger elastic modulus results in stronger resistance to deformation, leading to a weaker fluid–solid coupling effect and decreased gas production. Shale skeleton shrinkage deformation during desorption makes the fluid–solid coupling effect more pronounced, though it slightly reduces gas production. Higher Poisson’s ratio and Biot coefficient increase the deformation sensitivity of the shale reservoir and decrease the resistance to deformation in the fracture network zone, resulting in a more significant fluid–solid coupling effect and decreased gas production. As initial porosity increases, the absolute value of the fluid–solid coupling stress sensitivity coefficient decreases gradually, significantly enhancing the fluid–solid coupling effect characterized by the permeability model. The simulation results of the model align with actual field data, showing that gas production follows an “L-shaped” decline pattern with a coincidence rate exceeding 70%, verifying the model’s accuracy.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.