Common errors and avoidance strategies in English abstracts of China's food science journals

English abstracts play a crucial role in enhancing the international academic influence of academic journals and improving their acceptance among the global readership. By employing case studies and discourse analysis methods, this study examines the English abstracts of recent articles published in Food & Machinery and Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology. The analysis identifies several common errors in these abstracts, including inaccuracies in language use, inconsistencies in structure, and a lack of academic rigor. The primary causes for these issues can be attributed to inadequate language proficiency and writing skills, differences in cultural backgrounds between Chinese and English, and insufficient awareness of academic norms. Based on these findings, the study proposes several corrective measures, such as consulting authoritative food science reference works and parallel texts, systematically improving English grammar knowledge, and strengthening the translation of specialized terminology. These recommendations aim to provide practical guidance for Chinese scholars in drafting high-quality English abstracts.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2024.60176
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common errors and avoidance strategies in English abstracts of China's food science journals

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Common errors and avoidance strategies in English abstracts of China's food science journals

article en

Abstract

English abstracts play a crucial role in enhancing the international academic influence of academic journals and improving their acceptance among the global readership. By employing case studies and discourse analysis methods, this study examines the English abstracts of recent articles published in Food & Machinery and Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology. The analysis identifies several common errors in these abstracts, including inaccuracies in language use, inconsistencies in structure, and a lack of academic rigor. The primary causes for these issues can be attributed to inadequate language proficiency and writing skills, differences in cultural backgrounds between Chinese and English, and insufficient awareness of academic norms. Based on these findings, the study proposes several corrective measures, such as consulting authoritative food science reference works and parallel texts, systematically improving English grammar knowledge, and strengthening the translation of specialized terminology. These recommendations aim to provide practical guidance for Chinese scholars in drafting high-quality English abstracts.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.