Risk and prevention strategies for RhCE alloantibodies after blood transfusion in the Chinese population

Objective To explore a new approach to assess the risk of RhCE alloantibodies after transfusion and to establish a strategy for selecting RhCE compatible donors. Methods The Landsteiner’s law and the principle of population genetics were used to determine the combinations of RhCE antigen mismatch between donor and recipient in random blood transfusion, and the big data of Rh blood group distribution in the Chinese population were used to calculate mismatch probability and the chance of finding compatible donors. Results An analysis was performed for the data of RhD, C, c, E, and e antigen typing for 458 542 Chinese individuals reported in the literature, and the results showed that in the strategy of only using RhD matched donors, RhCE antigen mismatches accounted for 25.16% of all blood transfusions, among which the mismatch of Rh phenotypes DCCee, DccEE, DCcee, and DccEe accounted for 14.97%, 5.01%, 2.21%, and 2.26%, respectively, and the mismatch of the phenotypes Dccee, DCCEE, DCCEe, and DCcEE accounted for 0.71% in total. The individuals with DCcEe phenotype could accept the blood from a donor with any Rh phenotype. Conclusion The Rh blood group in the Chinese population is characterized by a high frequency of DCe haplotype, and individuals with Rh phenotype DCCee are the high-risk population for producing RhCE alloantibodies after blood transfusion. RhC, c, E, and e antigen typing is of great significance in searching for Rh antigen matched donors. Blood transfusion from donors compatible with common RhCE phenotypes can prevent the appearance of RhCE alloantibodies in approximately 90% of recipients.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13362/j.jpmed.202406003
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk and prevention strategies for RhCE alloantibodies after blood transfusion in the Chinese population

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Risk and prevention strategies for RhCE alloantibodies after blood transfusion in the Chinese population

article en

Abstract

Objective To explore a new approach to assess the risk of RhCE alloantibodies after transfusion and to establish a strategy for selecting RhCE compatible donors. Methods The Landsteiner’s law and the principle of population genetics were used to determine the combinations of RhCE antigen mismatch between donor and recipient in random blood transfusion, and the big data of Rh blood group distribution in the Chinese population were used to calculate mismatch probability and the chance of finding compatible donors. Results An analysis was performed for the data of RhD, C, c, E, and e antigen typing for 458 542 Chinese individuals reported in the literature, and the results showed that in the strategy of only using RhD matched donors, RhCE antigen mismatches accounted for 25.16% of all blood transfusions, among which the mismatch of Rh phenotypes DCCee, DccEE, DCcee, and DccEe accounted for 14.97%, 5.01%, 2.21%, and 2.26%, respectively, and the mismatch of the phenotypes Dccee, DCCEE, DCCEe, and DCcEE accounted for 0.71% in total. The individuals with DCcEe phenotype could accept the blood from a donor with any Rh phenotype. Conclusion The Rh blood group in the Chinese population is characterized by a high frequency of DCe haplotype, and individuals with Rh phenotype DCCee are the high-risk population for producing RhCE alloantibodies after blood transfusion. RhC, c, E, and e antigen typing is of great significance in searching for Rh antigen matched donors. Blood transfusion from donors compatible with common RhCE phenotypes can prevent the appearance of RhCE alloantibodies in approximately 90% of recipients.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
National Institutes of Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.