Replacing training on natural stimuli with pre-training on retinal waves accelerates learning for LSTM and GRU architectures.

<b>A.</b> Learning trajectories of three LSTM models on the simulated corridor training (left) and validation (right) datasets. Shown is the average MSE across five-fold cross-validation and the corresponding standard deviation. Note that the performance assessment for the model pre-trained for one epoch on retinal waves (<i>DirectedProp one epoch</i> in pink) starts at epoch two, ensuring direct comparability to the <i>NotPretrained</i> model as this model does not have an advantage in training time. Training continues beyond the epochs shown, with each model stopping individually once overfitting is detected. <b>B.</b> Same as panel A, but for GRU architectures. (PDF)

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012830.s003
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replacing training on natural stimuli with pre-training on retinal waves accelerates learning for LSTM and GRU architectures.

Figshare
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Replacing training on natural stimuli with pre-training on retinal waves accelerates learning for LSTM and GRU architectures.

article en

Abstract

<b>A.</b> Learning trajectories of three LSTM models on the simulated corridor training (left) and validation (right) datasets. Shown is the average MSE across five-fold cross-validation and the corresponding standard deviation. Note that the performance assessment for the model pre-trained for one epoch on retinal waves (<i>DirectedProp one epoch</i> in pink) starts at epoch two, ensuring direct comparability to the <i>NotPretrained</i> model as this model does not have an advantage in training time. Training continues beyond the epochs shown, with each model stopping individually once overfitting is detected. <b>B.</b> Same as panel A, but for GRU architectures. (PDF)

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Replacing training on natural stimuli with pre-training on retinal waves accelerates learning for LSTM and GRU architectures. · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS