A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for extracting high-positioned supernumerary teeth in the maxillary anterior midline region. Three surgical methods, the labial approach, the palatal approach, and a longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were compared. Methods A total of 102 patients were recruited from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Anhui Medical University between January and September 2024. They were randomly assigned via a random-digit table to three groups: the labial approach group (n=32), the palatal approach group (n=34), and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum group (n=36). Operation time, bone removal volume, postoperative midfacial swelling, degree of pain, and patient satisfaction across the three groups were recorded and compared. Results The average operation time in the labial approach group ((20.50±3.02) min) and the longitudinal incision group ((21.66±2.31) min) were both significantly shorter than that in the palatal approach group ((29.19±3.40) min). In contrast, the palatal approach group demonstrated markedly lower postoperative swelling and pain scores (P< 0.05), along with the highest patient satisfaction, as reflected in the OHIP-14 scale. However, the palatal approach required the greatest bone removal volume, measuring (91.19 ± 9.86)mm3. Conclusion Despite the palatal approach yielding superior outcomes in terms of postoperative pain control, swelling reduction, and patient satisfaction, it necessitated longer operation time and involved greater bone removal. Meanwhile, the labial approach and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were comparable in all measured parameters, showing no statistically significant differences. Therefore, when extracting high midline impacted teeth in the maxillary anterior region, the choice of surgical approach should balance safety, minimal invasiveness, and patient satisfaction.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2025.05.004
Primary Topic
dental development and anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
dental development and anomalies
article

A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla

article en

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for extracting high-positioned supernumerary teeth in the maxillary anterior midline region. Three surgical methods, the labial approach, the palatal approach, and a longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were compared. Methods A total of 102 patients were recruited from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Anhui Medical University between January and September 2024. They were randomly assigned via a random-digit table to three groups: the labial approach group (n=32), the palatal approach group (n=34), and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum group (n=36). Operation time, bone removal volume, postoperative midfacial swelling, degree of pain, and patient satisfaction across the three groups were recorded and compared. Results The average operation time in the labial approach group ((20.50±3.02) min) and the longitudinal incision group ((21.66±2.31) min) were both significantly shorter than that in the palatal approach group ((29.19±3.40) min). In contrast, the palatal approach group demonstrated markedly lower postoperative swelling and pain scores (P< 0.05), along with the highest patient satisfaction, as reflected in the OHIP-14 scale. However, the palatal approach required the greatest bone removal volume, measuring (91.19 ± 9.86)mm3. Conclusion Despite the palatal approach yielding superior outcomes in terms of postoperative pain control, swelling reduction, and patient satisfaction, it necessitated longer operation time and involved greater bone removal. Meanwhile, the labial approach and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were comparable in all measured parameters, showing no statistically significant differences. Therefore, when extracting high midline impacted teeth in the maxillary anterior region, the choice of surgical approach should balance safety, minimal invasiveness, and patient satisfaction.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Anhui Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
dental development and anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS