Research on the performance evaluation model of national key special projects of blood center

[Objective] To establish performance evaluation indicators and provide a scientific and reliable method for the performance evaluation for national key special projects of blood center. [Methods] Through literature review and Delphi method, the evaluation indicators for the national key special project performance of blood center were established. By sending indicator questionnaires to experts, the analytic hierarchy process was employed to determine the weights of each indicator. [Results] A total of 3 first-level evaluation indicators and 12 second-level evaluation indicators were established. The weights of the three first-level indicators of budget preparation, project management and project output were 0.301, 0.267 and 0.432, respectively. [Conclusion] By constructing the national key special project performance indicators of blood center, a quantifiable scientific evaluation of this process can be conducted.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2024.12.013
Primary Topic
Research studies in Vietnam
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the performance evaluation model of national key special projects of blood center

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Research studies in Vietnam
article

Research on the performance evaluation model of national key special projects of blood center

article en

Abstract

[Objective] To establish performance evaluation indicators and provide a scientific and reliable method for the performance evaluation for national key special projects of blood center. [Methods] Through literature review and Delphi method, the evaluation indicators for the national key special project performance of blood center were established. By sending indicator questionnaires to experts, the analytic hierarchy process was employed to determine the weights of each indicator. [Results] A total of 3 first-level evaluation indicators and 12 second-level evaluation indicators were established. The weights of the three first-level indicators of budget preparation, project management and project output were 0.301, 0.267 and 0.432, respectively. [Conclusion] By constructing the national key special project performance indicators of blood center, a quantifiable scientific evaluation of this process can be conducted.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Research studies in Vietnam
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.