The interaction effect in TP for each subject.

<p>(A) The conjunction map that combined the true-color versus false-color contrast with the interaction effect between Period (first half versus second half of sessions) and True-False for each of the 3 subjects (M1 to M3) at <i>p</i> < 0.01. Each slice’s anterior/posterior position is indicated on the top left corner (mm relative to the interaural canal). (B–D) FMRI responses to true- and false-colored objects in TP from the first and second halves of sessions for each subject, respectively. Individual analyses demonstrated similar trends for the 3 monkeys, although the results were not significant, likely due to the limited sample size used as a result of the request to avoid double dipping and the impact of the learning effect. (E–G) fMRI responses to true- and false-colored objects in TP for each session in each subject. Bars display mean values +/− SEM. Red asterisks indicate a significant difference between responses evoked by true- and false-colored stimuli; *<i>p</i> < 0.05, **<i>p</i> < 0.01, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001. The data underlying this figure are available in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002863#pbio.3002863.s036" target="_blank">S1 Data</a>.</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002863.s015
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interaction effect in TP for each subject.

Figshare
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

The interaction effect in TP for each subject.

article en

Abstract

<p>(A) The conjunction map that combined the true-color versus false-color contrast with the interaction effect between Period (first half versus second half of sessions) and True-False for each of the 3 subjects (M1 to M3) at <i>p</i> < 0.01. Each slice’s anterior/posterior position is indicated on the top left corner (mm relative to the interaural canal). (B–D) FMRI responses to true- and false-colored objects in TP from the first and second halves of sessions for each subject, respectively. Individual analyses demonstrated similar trends for the 3 monkeys, although the results were not significant, likely due to the limited sample size used as a result of the request to avoid double dipping and the impact of the learning effect. (E–G) fMRI responses to true- and false-colored objects in TP for each session in each subject. Bars display mean values +/− SEM. Red asterisks indicate a significant difference between responses evoked by true- and false-colored stimuli; *<i>p</i> < 0.05, **<i>p</i> < 0.01, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001. The data underlying this figure are available in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002863#pbio.3002863.s036" target="_blank">S1 Data</a>.</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.