The Challenges of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan and of Asymmetric Regionalism: A Resilience Opportunity for Italian Regions?

More than twenty years after the constitutional reform aimed at enhancing territorial autonomy in Italy, the relations between the State and the Regions are still based on an architecture that, in various sectors of the legal system, does not seem updated to the new framework. In particular, the State has not fully reconciled decentralization with equity of access to essential levels of services (ELS) concerning civil and social rights that must be guaranteed throughout the national territory. The implementation of fiscal autonomy of territorial governments is partial and not homogeneous. These critical issues must now be understood in light of the mandatory provisions of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) aimed at enacting fiscal federalism and the will expressed by the Parliament to implement asymmetric regionalism but only after the determination of the ELS. The obligations stemming from this framework make clear the implementation of the constitutional framework can no longer be postponed

Publication Details

Journal
Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine)
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2025-1-76
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Challenges of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan and of Asymmetric Regionalism: A Resilience Opportunity for Italian Regions?

Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine)
Regional resilience and development
article

The Challenges of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan and of Asymmetric Regionalism: A Resilience Opportunity for Italian Regions?

article en

Abstract

More than twenty years after the constitutional reform aimed at enhancing territorial autonomy in Italy, the relations between the State and the Regions are still based on an architecture that, in various sectors of the legal system, does not seem updated to the new framework. In particular, the State has not fully reconciled decentralization with equity of access to essential levels of services (ELS) concerning civil and social rights that must be guaranteed throughout the national territory. The implementation of fiscal autonomy of territorial governments is partial and not homogeneous. These critical issues must now be understood in light of the mandatory provisions of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) aimed at enacting fiscal federalism and the will expressed by the Parliament to implement asymmetric regionalism but only after the determination of the ELS. The obligations stemming from this framework make clear the implementation of the constitutional framework can no longer be postponed

Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Regional resilience and development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.