L'ambivalenza emotiva nell'ebraismo mosaico

The paper aims to investigate the importance of the psychoanalytic principle of emotional ambivalence towards the father figure on the Jewish religion at the time of Moses. In the first part, the article examines the relationship between Sigmund Freud’s two books Totem und Tabu and Der Mann Moses, which deal with the same subject matter and thus appear to be two chapters of a single piece of writing; yet it is pointed out that this process of fusion between the two texts has as its counterpart the reverse fission movement whereby the work on Moses can be considered as a bipartite volume. In the second part, the paper discusses Freud’s interpretation of the political, ethical and gnoseological set-up of the exodus community, which is governed by respect for authority, goodness and reason; however, following Freud’s account, the article suggests in conclusion that the tribes of Israel certainly revered the firmness of their leader Moses but at the same time hated it.

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Torino
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13135/2036-542x/11061
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

L'ambivalenza emotiva nell'ebraismo mosaico

Università degli Studi di Torino
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

L'ambivalenza emotiva nell'ebraismo mosaico

article en

Abstract

The paper aims to investigate the importance of the psychoanalytic principle of emotional ambivalence towards the father figure on the Jewish religion at the time of Moses. In the first part, the article examines the relationship between Sigmund Freud’s two books Totem und Tabu and Der Mann Moses, which deal with the same subject matter and thus appear to be two chapters of a single piece of writing; yet it is pointed out that this process of fusion between the two texts has as its counterpart the reverse fission movement whereby the work on Moses can be considered as a bipartite volume. In the second part, the paper discusses Freud’s interpretation of the political, ethical and gnoseological set-up of the exodus community, which is governed by respect for authority, goodness and reason; however, following Freud’s account, the article suggests in conclusion that the tribes of Israel certainly revered the firmness of their leader Moses but at the same time hated it.

Università degli Studi di Torino
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.