How platform cooperatives can redress abuses of authority within digital markets

After their advent, digital platforms were hailed as innovative institutional solutions capable of reducing transaction costs for a wide group of stakeholders by removing traditional intermediaries and facilitating the match of demand and supply through digital means. However, a group of big investor-owned platforms from Silicon Valley soon imposed themselves as monopolistic actors within digital markets, leveraging their strong bargaining position to abuse their authority and extract undue rents. Different legal strategies have been assessed in the last few years to limit this unilateral rule-setting power, particularly at the EU level. Nevertheless, little consideration has been given to alternative forms of platform organising, aimed at including the relevant stakeholders in the governance of platforms to redress power abuses. This article presents the case of platform cooperatives, which are platforms owned and governed by their workers and users. Moreover, the article considers the institutional complementarities that could help platform co-ops overcome challenges and compete with capitalist platforms on fair legal and political bases.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Torino
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13135/2785-7867/11340
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How platform cooperatives can redress abuses of authority within digital markets

Università degli Studi di Torino
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

How platform cooperatives can redress abuses of authority within digital markets

article en

Abstract

After their advent, digital platforms were hailed as innovative institutional solutions capable of reducing transaction costs for a wide group of stakeholders by removing traditional intermediaries and facilitating the match of demand and supply through digital means. However, a group of big investor-owned platforms from Silicon Valley soon imposed themselves as monopolistic actors within digital markets, leveraging their strong bargaining position to abuse their authority and extract undue rents. Different legal strategies have been assessed in the last few years to limit this unilateral rule-setting power, particularly at the EU level. Nevertheless, little consideration has been given to alternative forms of platform organising, aimed at including the relevant stakeholders in the governance of platforms to redress power abuses. This article presents the case of platform cooperatives, which are platforms owned and governed by their workers and users. Moreover, the article considers the institutional complementarities that could help platform co-ops overcome challenges and compete with capitalist platforms on fair legal and political bases.

Università degli Studi di Torino
University of Pavia (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.