Activities and barriers in online professional development: A systematic literature review

\nDespite the increased use of technology to facilitate English teachers’ professional development, there is a lack of comprehensive review of the employed activities and barriers. The current study aims to comprehensively look into the landscape of online professional development activities and the encountered barriers. Employing a systematic literature review approach, activity types and barriers of online professional development were identified. Through rigorous methodology, including database searches and inclusion criteria, 18 studies conducted in diverse global contexts were reviewed. The findings reveal four categorized professional development activities: structured learning, mentoring, informal learning, knowledge sharing, and social interaction. Barriers encompass attitudinal, physical, and structural factors such as negative attitudes, internet connectivity issues, and collaboration difficulties. The study concludes that effective communication, tailored solutions, and stakeholder collaboration are essential for overcoming the barriers of online professional development. The findings imply the crucial roles of stakeholders in enhancing online professional development for teachers. Future research should address the interplay of the barriers, their impacts, and innovative strategies.\n

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420204006/pdf
Primary Topic
Educational Leadership and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Activities and barriers in online professional development: A systematic literature review

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Educational Leadership and Innovation
article

Activities and barriers in online professional development: A systematic literature review

article en

Abstract

\nDespite the increased use of technology to facilitate English teachers’ professional development, there is a lack of comprehensive review of the employed activities and barriers. The current study aims to comprehensively look into the landscape of online professional development activities and the encountered barriers. Employing a systematic literature review approach, activity types and barriers of online professional development were identified. Through rigorous methodology, including database searches and inclusion criteria, 18 studies conducted in diverse global contexts were reviewed. The findings reveal four categorized professional development activities: structured learning, mentoring, informal learning, knowledge sharing, and social interaction. Barriers encompass attitudinal, physical, and structural factors such as negative attitudes, internet connectivity issues, and collaboration difficulties. The study concludes that effective communication, tailored solutions, and stakeholder collaboration are essential for overcoming the barriers of online professional development. The findings imply the crucial roles of stakeholders in enhancing online professional development for teachers. Future research should address the interplay of the barriers, their impacts, and innovative strategies.\n

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Educational Leadership and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Activities and barriers in online professional development: A systematic literature review · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS