Spukt ein autokratisches Gespenst in der Chinaforschung? Erkenntnisse aus Umfragedaten zu grenzüberschreitenden Repressionserfahrungen

This article examines the research climate among German-speaking China scholars, focusing on the prevalence of cross-border repression. Drawing on a survey among 87 members of two major China Studies associations in German-speaking countries, the article finds that the respondents’ scholarship is affected by so-called ‘soft’ repression. While ‘hard’ repression is much less widespread among the surveyed scholars, we argue that the distinction is fluid in practice, and we interpret our findings as evidence that the Chinese party-state attempts to repress free academia across borders. However, accusations that the Chinese party-state has considerable bearing on China researchers do not correspond to the self-perception of most survey participants. Qualitative responses indicate that respondents discuss the topic of selfcensorship openly, often citing research ethics as an explanation for conscious selfcensorship decisions. We also find that a minority of respondents worries about a polarised public and academic debate about China, even listing perceived pressures in the context of this debate as one of the main challenges currently facing China scholars.

Publication Details

Journal
University Library Heidelberg
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11588/asien.2023.166/167.27358
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spukt ein autokratisches Gespenst in der Chinaforschung? Erkenntnisse aus Umfragedaten zu grenzüberschreitenden Repressionserfahrungen

University Library Heidelberg
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

Spukt ein autokratisches Gespenst in der Chinaforschung? Erkenntnisse aus Umfragedaten zu grenzüberschreitenden Repressionserfahrungen

article en

Abstract

This article examines the research climate among German-speaking China scholars, focusing on the prevalence of cross-border repression. Drawing on a survey among 87 members of two major China Studies associations in German-speaking countries, the article finds that the respondents’ scholarship is affected by so-called ‘soft’ repression. While ‘hard’ repression is much less widespread among the surveyed scholars, we argue that the distinction is fluid in practice, and we interpret our findings as evidence that the Chinese party-state attempts to repress free academia across borders. However, accusations that the Chinese party-state has considerable bearing on China researchers do not correspond to the self-perception of most survey participants. Qualitative responses indicate that respondents discuss the topic of selfcensorship openly, often citing research ethics as an explanation for conscious selfcensorship decisions. We also find that a minority of respondents worries about a polarised public and academic debate about China, even listing perceived pressures in the context of this debate as one of the main challenges currently facing China scholars.

University Library Heidelberg
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.