Comparison of the efficacy of arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation combined with enhanced recovery after surgery and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures

Objective To compare the clinical effects of arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and open reduction and internal fixation surgery (ORIF) in the treatment of posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures. MethodsSeventy patients with posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures in the Department of Orthopaedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively selected and divided into ARIF group (with ERAS, n=32) and ORIF group (without ERAS, n=38) according to the treatment methods. All patients were evaluated for fracture type by imaging examination after admission. The operation time, length of hospital stay, early postoperative pain score (evaluated by visual analogue scale [VAS]), knee joint function (evaluated by hospital for special surgery [HSS] scale) at 3 months and thigh circumference difference at 6 months postoperatively were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe operation time in the ARIF group was significantly shorter than that in the ORIF group ([67.84±9.89] min vs [85.16±9.18] min, P<0.001), and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ARIF group ([7.13±1.41] d vs [8.74±1.84] d, P<0.001). On the third day after operation, the VAS score in the ARIF group was significantly lower than that in the ORIF group ([4.00±1.44] vs [5.39±1.24], P<0.001). ARIF group had better joint function than ORIF group 3 months after operation, and the difference of 10 cm thigh circumference on patella in ARIF group was smaller than that in ORIF group 6 months after operation. ConclusionsCompared to ORIF, patients with posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures treated with ARIF combined with ERAS showed faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay, and more precise clinical efficacy.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2024.20240628
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the efficacy of arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation combined with enhanced recovery after surgery and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Comparison of the efficacy of arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation combined with enhanced recovery after surgery and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures

article en

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and open reduction and internal fixation surgery (ORIF) in the treatment of posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures. MethodsSeventy patients with posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures in the Department of Orthopaedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively selected and divided into ARIF group (with ERAS, n=32) and ORIF group (without ERAS, n=38) according to the treatment methods. All patients were evaluated for fracture type by imaging examination after admission. The operation time, length of hospital stay, early postoperative pain score (evaluated by visual analogue scale [VAS]), knee joint function (evaluated by hospital for special surgery [HSS] scale) at 3 months and thigh circumference difference at 6 months postoperatively were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe operation time in the ARIF group was significantly shorter than that in the ORIF group ([67.84±9.89] min vs [85.16±9.18] min, P<0.001), and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ARIF group ([7.13±1.41] d vs [8.74±1.84] d, P<0.001). On the third day after operation, the VAS score in the ARIF group was significantly lower than that in the ORIF group ([4.00±1.44] vs [5.39±1.24], P<0.001). ARIF group had better joint function than ORIF group 3 months after operation, and the difference of 10 cm thigh circumference on patella in ARIF group was smaller than that in ORIF group 6 months after operation. ConclusionsCompared to ORIF, patients with posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures treated with ARIF combined with ERAS showed faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay, and more precise clinical efficacy.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of the efficacy of arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation combined with enhanced recovery after surgery and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of posterior lateral tibial plateau fractures · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS