Solar flare rates and probabilities based on the McIntosh classification: Impacts of GOES/XRS rescaling and revisited sunspot classifications

In December 2019, the Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) started using the GOES<ns0:xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN2">1</ns0:xref>-16 satellite as its primary input for solar X-ray flux monitoring. As such, it stopped applying a scaling factor that had been applied since the GOES-8 came into operation. This has an important impact on the number of flares that can be expected and on the flare rates associated with the McIntosh classifications, which are often used to help forecast flare activity. To quantify the effects, the flare intensities for the period covering 1976–2019 have all been recalculated. An increase of respectively 55% and 52% in the total number of M-class and X-class events has been observed. Also, for the same period, McIntosh classifications have been redone by visually evaluating 4720 Kanzelhöhe solar drawings (about 1 drawing every 3 days) and determining the McIntosh type of 22232 sunspot regions. There is an excellent agreement with the values originally reported by <ns0:xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R44">McIntosh (1990)</ns0:xref>, but some deviations from the SWPC data are found. For a majority of the McIntosh classes, an increase in the flare rates is observed, which translates into increased flare probabilities assuming a Poisson distribution for the flare occurrence. This is an important given for space weather forecasters when making solar flare forecasts. The McIntosh classification is successful in distinguishing flare active from flare inactive regions: Considering only the “p” and “c” components of the McIntosh classification and linking them to the number of flares associated with the corresponding sunspot groups, we find that 48% of all M- and X-class flares in our study are produced by only 8% of all sunspot groups, belonging to the McIntosh subclasses -ai, -kc, and -ki corresponding to sunspot groups with an asymmetric main spot and a more complex (intermediate or compact) internal sunspot distribution. About 57% of all classified sunspot groups produce only 12% of all M- and X-class flares. They belong to the McIntosh subclasses -so, -sx, -xo, and -xx, which correspond to the smallest and simplest sunspot regions and the phases marking the emergence and final decay of sunspot groups (Axx, Bxo, Hsx). Though the McIntosh classification is a great tool to forecast flare activity, there remain large differences in the actual flare behaviour of individual sunspot groups within the same McIntosh class.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2025007/pdf
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solar flare rates and probabilities based on the McIntosh classification: Impacts of GOES/XRS rescaling and revisited sunspot classifications

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Solar flare rates and probabilities based on the McIntosh classification: Impacts of GOES/XRS rescaling and revisited sunspot classifications

article en

Abstract

In December 2019, the Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) started using the GOES<ns0:xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN2">1</ns0:xref>-16 satellite as its primary input for solar X-ray flux monitoring. As such, it stopped applying a scaling factor that had been applied since the GOES-8 came into operation. This has an important impact on the number of flares that can be expected and on the flare rates associated with the McIntosh classifications, which are often used to help forecast flare activity. To quantify the effects, the flare intensities for the period covering 1976–2019 have all been recalculated. An increase of respectively 55% and 52% in the total number of M-class and X-class events has been observed. Also, for the same period, McIntosh classifications have been redone by visually evaluating 4720 Kanzelhöhe solar drawings (about 1 drawing every 3 days) and determining the McIntosh type of 22232 sunspot regions. There is an excellent agreement with the values originally reported by <ns0:xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R44">McIntosh (1990)</ns0:xref>, but some deviations from the SWPC data are found. For a majority of the McIntosh classes, an increase in the flare rates is observed, which translates into increased flare probabilities assuming a Poisson distribution for the flare occurrence. This is an important given for space weather forecasters when making solar flare forecasts. The McIntosh classification is successful in distinguishing flare active from flare inactive regions: Considering only the “p” and “c” components of the McIntosh classification and linking them to the number of flares associated with the corresponding sunspot groups, we find that 48% of all M- and X-class flares in our study are produced by only 8% of all sunspot groups, belonging to the McIntosh subclasses -ai, -kc, and -ki corresponding to sunspot groups with an asymmetric main spot and a more complex (intermediate or compact) internal sunspot distribution. About 57% of all classified sunspot groups produce only 12% of all M- and X-class flares. They belong to the McIntosh subclasses -so, -sx, -xo, and -xx, which correspond to the smallest and simplest sunspot regions and the phases marking the emergence and final decay of sunspot groups (Axx, Bxo, Hsx). Though the McIntosh classification is a great tool to forecast flare activity, there remain large differences in the actual flare behaviour of individual sunspot groups within the same McIntosh class.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.