<i>C</i><sub>4</sub>‑Symmetric Bowl-ShapedDiruthenium Tetracarboxylate Catalysts for Enantioselective C–HFunctionalization Using Donor/Acceptor Carbenes

Cationic diruthenium (II,III) tetracarboxylate catalysts have been shown to catalyze selective intermolecular C–H functionalization reactions using donor/acceptor carbenes in high yield and with high levels of enantioselectivity. The diruthenium catalysts were compared to the analogous dirhodium (II,II) tetracarboxylate and showed similar levels of enantioselectivity for most reactions. A distinctive feature of the diruthenium catalysts is a greater preference for C–H functionalization over cyclopropanation compared to the corresponding dirhodium catalysts. Also, the diruthenium catalysts have a greater preference for sterically more accessible sites compared with their dirhodium counterparts. These studies show that the diruthenium catalysts are generally effective catalysts for enantioselective intermolecular C–H functionalization, but further optimization would be needed for them to match the dirhodium catalysts in terms of functional group compatibility, turnover frequency, and turnover numbers.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5c01052.s001
Primary Topic
Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C4‑Symmetric Bowl-ShapedDiruthenium Tetracarboxylate Catalysts for Enantioselective C–HFunctionalization Using Donor/Acceptor Carbenes

Figshare
Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
article

C4‑Symmetric Bowl-ShapedDiruthenium Tetracarboxylate Catalysts for Enantioselective C–HFunctionalization Using Donor/Acceptor Carbenes

article en

Abstract

Cationic diruthenium (II,III) tetracarboxylate catalysts have been shown to catalyze selective intermolecular C–H functionalization reactions using donor/acceptor carbenes in high yield and with high levels of enantioselectivity. The diruthenium catalysts were compared to the analogous dirhodium (II,II) tetracarboxylate and showed similar levels of enantioselectivity for most reactions. A distinctive feature of the diruthenium catalysts is a greater preference for C–H functionalization over cyclopropanation compared to the corresponding dirhodium catalysts. Also, the diruthenium catalysts have a greater preference for sterically more accessible sites compared with their dirhodium counterparts. These studies show that the diruthenium catalysts are generally effective catalysts for enantioselective intermolecular C–H functionalization, but further optimization would be needed for them to match the dirhodium catalysts in terms of functional group compatibility, turnover frequency, and turnover numbers.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.