Do the Hydrogen\nEvolution Reaction and Oxygen Reduction\nReaction Really Need To Be Suppressed in O<sub>2</sub>‑Tolerant\nCO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction Catalyzed by DAE-BPy-CoPor and Co-TAPP?

This letter chooses DAE-BPy-CoPor [DAE, 1,2-bis(5′-formyl-2′-methylthien-3′-yl)cyclopentene;\nBPy, 2,2′-bipyridine-5,5′-dicarbaldehyde; and CoPor,\ntwo-dimensional cobalt porphyrin-based covalent organic framework]\nand Co-TAPP [10,15,20-tetrakis(4-aminophenyl)porphinatocobalt] as\ntwo model catalysts to investigate the effect of the hydrogen evolution\nreaction (HER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in the O<sub>2</sub>-tolerant CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR). Both catalysts have been proven to have CO<sub>2</sub>RR activity\nat a potential range from −0.60 to −1.10 V when CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> are co-feeding (Zhu, H.-J.; Si, D.-H.; Guo, H.; Chen, Z.; Cao, R.; Huang, Y.-B. Oxygen-tolerant CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction over covalent organic frameworks via photoswitching\ncontrol oxygen passivation strategy. Nat.\nCommun. 2024, 15, 1479, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45959-9). The calculated results\nby grand canonical density functional theory (GC-DFT) and microkinetic\n(MK) simulation show that the effect of HER could be categorized into\ntwo groups: (1) Positive *H formation energy: HER would have no effect\non the turnover frequency (TOF) of the CO<sub>2</sub>RR. (2) Negative\n*H formation energy: HER would also have no effect to the TOF of CO<sub>2</sub>RR when the calculated limiting potential for HER is larger\nthan that for CO<sub>2</sub>RR. Otherwise, all active sites would\nbe covered by *H and poisoned before CO<sub>2</sub>RR can happen.\nThe effect of ORR could be categorized into three types: (1) ORR would\nhave no effect to the TOF of the CO<sub>2</sub>RR when ORR happened\nwith the CO<sub>2</sub>RR at the same time. (2) ORR is suppressed;\nthe active site is covered by an intermediate state (such as *OH);\nand the CO<sub>2</sub>RR is also suppressed because of the poisoned\nactive site. (3) ORR is suppressed; the active site is not covered;\nand the TOF of the CO<sub>2</sub>RR is not affected.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02957.s001
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do the Hydrogen\nEvolution Reaction and Oxygen Reduction\nReaction Really Need To Be Suppressed in O2‑Tolerant\nCO2 Electroreduction Catalyzed by DAE-BPy-CoPor and Co-TAPP?

Figshare
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
article

Do the Hydrogen\nEvolution Reaction and Oxygen Reduction\nReaction Really Need To Be Suppressed in O2‑Tolerant\nCO2 Electroreduction Catalyzed by DAE-BPy-CoPor and Co-TAPP?

article en

Abstract

This letter chooses DAE-BPy-CoPor [DAE, 1,2-bis(5′-formyl-2′-methylthien-3′-yl)cyclopentene;\nBPy, 2,2′-bipyridine-5,5′-dicarbaldehyde; and CoPor,\ntwo-dimensional cobalt porphyrin-based covalent organic framework]\nand Co-TAPP [10,15,20-tetrakis(4-aminophenyl)porphinatocobalt] as\ntwo model catalysts to investigate the effect of the hydrogen evolution\nreaction (HER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in the O<sub>2</sub>-tolerant CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR). Both catalysts have been proven to have CO<sub>2</sub>RR activity\nat a potential range from −0.60 to −1.10 V when CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> are co-feeding (Zhu, H.-J.; Si, D.-H.; Guo, H.; Chen, Z.; Cao, R.; Huang, Y.-B. Oxygen-tolerant CO<sub>2</sub> electroreduction over covalent organic frameworks via photoswitching\ncontrol oxygen passivation strategy. Nat.\nCommun. 2024, 15, 1479, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45959-9). The calculated results\nby grand canonical density functional theory (GC-DFT) and microkinetic\n(MK) simulation show that the effect of HER could be categorized into\ntwo groups: (1) Positive *H formation energy: HER would have no effect\non the turnover frequency (TOF) of the CO<sub>2</sub>RR. (2) Negative\n*H formation energy: HER would also have no effect to the TOF of CO<sub>2</sub>RR when the calculated limiting potential for HER is larger\nthan that for CO<sub>2</sub>RR. Otherwise, all active sites would\nbe covered by *H and poisoned before CO<sub>2</sub>RR can happen.\nThe effect of ORR could be categorized into three types: (1) ORR would\nhave no effect to the TOF of the CO<sub>2</sub>RR when ORR happened\nwith the CO<sub>2</sub>RR at the same time. (2) ORR is suppressed;\nthe active site is covered by an intermediate state (such as *OH);\nand the CO<sub>2</sub>RR is also suppressed because of the poisoned\nactive site. (3) ORR is suppressed; the active site is not covered;\nand the TOF of the CO<sub>2</sub>RR is not affected.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do the Hydrogen\nEvolution Reaction and Oxygen Reduction\nReaction Really Need To Be Suppressed in O<sub>2</sub>‑Tolerant\nCO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction Catalyzed by DAE-BPy-CoPor and Co-TAPP? · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS