Parasitic\nProducts Formed during Discharge Limit Capacity\nand Rechargeability in Li–O<sub>2</sub> Cells

Aprotic metal–oxygen batteries, especially Li–O<sub>2</sub> and Na–O<sub>2</sub> batteries, are considered high\nenergy density alternatives to conventional Li-ion batteries. However,\nthe rechargeability and, consequently, the cycle life of the metal–oxygen\nbatteries are poor. In general, the poor rechargeability of these\nbatteries is attributed to the oxidative instabilities of the carbon\ncathode and aprotic electrolytes at high oxidative potentials during\ncharge. In this work, we employ complementary measurements, including\nelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy, distribution of relaxation\ntimes analysis, chemical titrations of discharge products, and differential\nelectrochemical mass spectrometry measurements to investigate electrochemical\nprocesses that limit rechargeability in these chemistries. Contrary\nto the extant understanding, our analysis shows that the origin of\nrecharge inefficiencies in Li–O<sub>2</sub> cells is the formation\nof parasitic side products during discharge. Significantly, our results\nsuggest that cathode passivation by Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is\nnot capacity-limiting during discharge, suggesting that increased\ncapacities and rechargeability should be simultaneously possible in\nLi–O<sub>2</sub> batteries.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03142.s001
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parasitic\nProducts Formed during Discharge Limit Capacity\nand Rechargeability in Li–O2 Cells

Figshare
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Parasitic\nProducts Formed during Discharge Limit Capacity\nand Rechargeability in Li–O2 Cells

article en

Abstract

Aprotic metal–oxygen batteries, especially Li–O<sub>2</sub> and Na–O<sub>2</sub> batteries, are considered high\nenergy density alternatives to conventional Li-ion batteries. However,\nthe rechargeability and, consequently, the cycle life of the metal–oxygen\nbatteries are poor. In general, the poor rechargeability of these\nbatteries is attributed to the oxidative instabilities of the carbon\ncathode and aprotic electrolytes at high oxidative potentials during\ncharge. In this work, we employ complementary measurements, including\nelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy, distribution of relaxation\ntimes analysis, chemical titrations of discharge products, and differential\nelectrochemical mass spectrometry measurements to investigate electrochemical\nprocesses that limit rechargeability in these chemistries. Contrary\nto the extant understanding, our analysis shows that the origin of\nrecharge inefficiencies in Li–O<sub>2</sub> cells is the formation\nof parasitic side products during discharge. Significantly, our results\nsuggest that cathode passivation by Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is\nnot capacity-limiting during discharge, suggesting that increased\ncapacities and rechargeability should be simultaneously possible in\nLi–O<sub>2</sub> batteries.

Figshare
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.