Temperature\nEffects in Conventional and RAFT Photopolymerization

Photochemical processes are often thought to be temperature-independent.\nHowever, photochemical polymerization involves photochemical processes\nsuch as light-driven radical generation coupled with thermal-driven\nreactions such as monomer propagation. The apparent activation energy\nof propagation, <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>), of a series of three monomers, methyl acrylate (MA), methyl\nmethacrylate (MMA), and styrene (STY), are deduced from Arrhenius\nanalysis of conventional and RAFT photopolymerization of these monomers\nacross a range of corresponding temperatures. The deduced <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) was compared\nwith the benchmarked <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) derived from pulse laser polymerizations coupled with\nsize exclusion chromatography (PLP-SEC). For conventional photopolymerization\nof MA, MMA and STY, the relatively small discrepancy between the photopolymerization-derived <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) and the <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) from PLP-SEC\nwas rationalized due to temperature-induced changes in termination.\nThe deviation between the <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) measured in RAFT photopolymerization and <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) from PLP-SEC depends\non the retardation strength in RAFT polymerizations. MMA and STY monomers\nare characterized with minimal retardation and recorded excellent\nagreement in PLP-SEC and RAFT-derived <i>E</i><sub>p</sub> values. However, the RAFT photopolymerization of MA, which is subject\nto strong retardation, had a much larger <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) than the <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) from PLP-SEC. The high apparent <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) in RAFT polymerization\nof MA is likely due to the added influence of temperature-induced\nchanges in the RAFT equilibrium. Overall, these results rationalize\ntemperature-dependent effects in photochemical reactions.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02001.s001
Primary Topic
Photopolymerization techniques and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temperature\nEffects in Conventional and RAFT Photopolymerization

Figshare
Photopolymerization techniques and applications
article

Temperature\nEffects in Conventional and RAFT Photopolymerization

article en

Abstract

Photochemical processes are often thought to be temperature-independent.\nHowever, photochemical polymerization involves photochemical processes\nsuch as light-driven radical generation coupled with thermal-driven\nreactions such as monomer propagation. The apparent activation energy\nof propagation, <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>), of a series of three monomers, methyl acrylate (MA), methyl\nmethacrylate (MMA), and styrene (STY), are deduced from Arrhenius\nanalysis of conventional and RAFT photopolymerization of these monomers\nacross a range of corresponding temperatures. The deduced <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) was compared\nwith the benchmarked <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) derived from pulse laser polymerizations coupled with\nsize exclusion chromatography (PLP-SEC). For conventional photopolymerization\nof MA, MMA and STY, the relatively small discrepancy between the photopolymerization-derived <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) and the <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) from PLP-SEC\nwas rationalized due to temperature-induced changes in termination.\nThe deviation between the <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) measured in RAFT photopolymerization and <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) from PLP-SEC depends\non the retardation strength in RAFT polymerizations. MMA and STY monomers\nare characterized with minimal retardation and recorded excellent\nagreement in PLP-SEC and RAFT-derived <i>E</i><sub>p</sub> values. However, the RAFT photopolymerization of MA, which is subject\nto strong retardation, had a much larger <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) than the <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>k</i><sub>p</sub>) from PLP-SEC. The high apparent <i>E</i><sub>A</sub>(<i>R</i><sub>p</sub>) in RAFT polymerization\nof MA is likely due to the added influence of temperature-induced\nchanges in the RAFT equilibrium. Overall, these results rationalize\ntemperature-dependent effects in photochemical reactions.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Photopolymerization techniques and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.