Temporal andSpatial Variation in Hydroxyl RadicalScavenging Capacity in Drinking Water and Correlation to Water QualityParameters

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are being used more frequently in drinking water treatment plants for purposes such as removing taste and odor-causing compounds or to control recalcitrant organic contaminants. Water’s hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (<i>S</i><sub>c</sub>) is an important parameter for AOP design and operation, but due to complexity in its measurement, <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> data are limited and knowledge of its temporal and spatial variation is sparse. Furthermore, the feasibility of estimating <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> through monitoring common water quality parameters is unclear. The variability in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> of water from five surface water plants and one groundwater plant was measured for 1 year along with total organic carbon, total inorganic carbon, ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm, and fluorescence emission-excitation matrices. The results showed about a 10–25% variation in the <i>S</i><sub>c</sub>, and <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> was not well-correlated with any of the water quality parameters measured. The reduction in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> across ultrafiltration treatment was similar to that across conventional treatment (15–30%). Due to the scavenging capacity of the added oxidant, the modeled variation in UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> or UV/chlorine performance due to <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> variation was small (∼5–10% change in the pollutant removal rate).

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00907.s001
Primary Topic
Advanced oxidation water treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal andSpatial Variation in Hydroxyl RadicalScavenging Capacity in Drinking Water and Correlation to Water QualityParameters

Figshare
Advanced oxidation water treatment
article

Temporal andSpatial Variation in Hydroxyl RadicalScavenging Capacity in Drinking Water and Correlation to Water QualityParameters

article en

Abstract

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are being used more frequently in drinking water treatment plants for purposes such as removing taste and odor-causing compounds or to control recalcitrant organic contaminants. Water’s hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (<i>S</i><sub>c</sub>) is an important parameter for AOP design and operation, but due to complexity in its measurement, <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> data are limited and knowledge of its temporal and spatial variation is sparse. Furthermore, the feasibility of estimating <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> through monitoring common water quality parameters is unclear. The variability in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> of water from five surface water plants and one groundwater plant was measured for 1 year along with total organic carbon, total inorganic carbon, ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm, and fluorescence emission-excitation matrices. The results showed about a 10–25% variation in the <i>S</i><sub>c</sub>, and <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> was not well-correlated with any of the water quality parameters measured. The reduction in <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> across ultrafiltration treatment was similar to that across conventional treatment (15–30%). Due to the scavenging capacity of the added oxidant, the modeled variation in UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> or UV/chlorine performance due to <i>S</i><sub>c</sub> variation was small (∼5–10% change in the pollutant removal rate).

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Advanced oxidation water treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.