Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 2: Hazards control

Safety is a critical consideration in the oil mill industry, particularly in the context of solvent extraction processes. This study focuses on the safety concerns associated with various solvents used in oil extraction, highlighting the potential risks to workers and end consumers, as well as environmental impacts. The analysis reveals that alcohols, such as ethanol and isopropanol, generally offer better safety profiles compared to hexane, despite presenting higher risks in terms of ATEX (explosive atmosphere) considerations at ambient temperature. These alcohols have higher electrical conductivity, which reduces the risk of electrostatic charge accumulation and subsequent ignition. However, methanol stands out as particularly hazardous due to its wide explosivity range and low minimum ignition energy. Ketones, including acetone and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), and ethyl acetate also show relatively favourable safety characteristics. These solvents exhibit good electrical conductivity and lower toxicity levels, making them safer alternatives to hexane. Ethyl acetate and MEK are particularly noted for their compatibility with existing safety protocols and equipment. On the other hand, methanol, hexane, and dichloromethane (DCM) rank poorly in multi-criteria safety comparisons. Methanol, DCM and hexanes are presenting specific toxicities making these solvents less desirable from a safety perspective. 2-Methyloxolane (2-MeOx) occupies an intermediate position, with some improvements over hexane but challenges related to its low water miscibility and potential for peroxide formation. The study concludes that while no single solvent is superior across all safety criteria, alcohols and certain ketones could present promising alternatives to hexane if safety was the dominant criteria of selection. In an holistic approach, the possible improvements in safety brought by these solvent must be balanced by their impacts on other criteria like energy consumption, products quality, and economic affordability.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2024028/pdf
Primary Topic
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 2: Hazards control

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
article

Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 2: Hazards control

article en

Abstract

Safety is a critical consideration in the oil mill industry, particularly in the context of solvent extraction processes. This study focuses on the safety concerns associated with various solvents used in oil extraction, highlighting the potential risks to workers and end consumers, as well as environmental impacts. The analysis reveals that alcohols, such as ethanol and isopropanol, generally offer better safety profiles compared to hexane, despite presenting higher risks in terms of ATEX (explosive atmosphere) considerations at ambient temperature. These alcohols have higher electrical conductivity, which reduces the risk of electrostatic charge accumulation and subsequent ignition. However, methanol stands out as particularly hazardous due to its wide explosivity range and low minimum ignition energy. Ketones, including acetone and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), and ethyl acetate also show relatively favourable safety characteristics. These solvents exhibit good electrical conductivity and lower toxicity levels, making them safer alternatives to hexane. Ethyl acetate and MEK are particularly noted for their compatibility with existing safety protocols and equipment. On the other hand, methanol, hexane, and dichloromethane (DCM) rank poorly in multi-criteria safety comparisons. Methanol, DCM and hexanes are presenting specific toxicities making these solvents less desirable from a safety perspective. 2-Methyloxolane (2-MeOx) occupies an intermediate position, with some improvements over hexane but challenges related to its low water miscibility and potential for peroxide formation. The study concludes that while no single solvent is superior across all safety criteria, alcohols and certain ketones could present promising alternatives to hexane if safety was the dominant criteria of selection. In an holistic approach, the possible improvements in safety brought by these solvent must be balanced by their impacts on other criteria like energy consumption, products quality, and economic affordability.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Solvent solutions: comparing extraction methods for edible oils and proteins in a changing regulatory landscape. Part 2: Hazards control · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS