Predicting incident dementia in the UK Biobank with smartwatches

BACKGROUND: The early detection of dementia is paramount for clinical study design and early treatment. Smartwatches allow for passive data collection of behavior, making it an accessible and scalable data source. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of smartwatch data in identifying incident Parkinson’s disease. This study seeks to explore the potential of smartwatch‐derived data in predicting incident dementia. METHOD: Using UK Biobank, we investigated the predictive value of accelerometry in identifying incident (N = 201) all cause dementia in the general population (N = 33009), including healthy controls and other diseases). We further examined performance in identification from age and sex matched healthy control (N = 201) and from all healthy control (N = 24987). We compared the performance with models based on genetics, lifestyle, blood biochemistry or prodromal symptoms data. Feature analysis identified the most stable contributors to the risk prediction. RESULT: A machine learning model trained using accelerometry data achieved higher test performance (Figure 1) for identifying incident dementia in the general population (AUPRC 0.04±0.01, prevalence: 0.006) than models based on genetics (p‐value = 0.008) and lifestyle (p‐value = 0.02). It performed on‐par with models based on blood biochemisty (AUPRC 0.03±0.005) and prodromal symptoms (AUPRC 0.04±0.02). A combined model achieved highest performance (AUPRC 0.08±0.03) with identified important and stable features (Figure 2) including age (mean coefficient and standard error: 0.93±0.08), polygenic risk score for Alzheimer’s disease (0.53±0.06), mean acceleration during light physical activity (‐0.29±0.04), and maximum time spent continuously asleep (‐0.36±0.03). CONCLUSION: Accelerometry with features describing activity and sleep did not outperform other modalities in the identification of incident dementia. Further features derived from accelerometry need to be investigated for their potential use in early screening for dementia.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed Central
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095464
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting incident dementia in the UK Biobank with smartwatches

PubMed Central
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Predicting incident dementia in the UK Biobank with smartwatches

article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The early detection of dementia is paramount for clinical study design and early treatment. Smartwatches allow for passive data collection of behavior, making it an accessible and scalable data source. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of smartwatch data in identifying incident Parkinson’s disease. This study seeks to explore the potential of smartwatch‐derived data in predicting incident dementia. METHOD: Using UK Biobank, we investigated the predictive value of accelerometry in identifying incident (N = 201) all cause dementia in the general population (N = 33009), including healthy controls and other diseases). We further examined performance in identification from age and sex matched healthy control (N = 201) and from all healthy control (N = 24987). We compared the performance with models based on genetics, lifestyle, blood biochemistry or prodromal symptoms data. Feature analysis identified the most stable contributors to the risk prediction. RESULT: A machine learning model trained using accelerometry data achieved higher test performance (Figure 1) for identifying incident dementia in the general population (AUPRC 0.04±0.01, prevalence: 0.006) than models based on genetics (p‐value = 0.008) and lifestyle (p‐value = 0.02). It performed on‐par with models based on blood biochemisty (AUPRC 0.03±0.005) and prodromal symptoms (AUPRC 0.04±0.02). A combined model achieved highest performance (AUPRC 0.08±0.03) with identified important and stable features (Figure 2) including age (mean coefficient and standard error: 0.93±0.08), polygenic risk score for Alzheimer’s disease (0.53±0.06), mean acceleration during light physical activity (‐0.29±0.04), and maximum time spent continuously asleep (‐0.36±0.03). CONCLUSION: Accelerometry with features describing activity and sleep did not outperform other modalities in the identification of incident dementia. Further features derived from accelerometry need to be investigated for their potential use in early screening for dementia.

PubMed Central
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Institute of Mental Health (GB), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.