Source discrimination by classical characterization methods, FTIR and statistical analysis – a prerequisite for thermochemical conversion of agriculture biomass residues by torrefaction and pyrolysis

The possibility for rapid and facile biomass characterization and classification, including prediction, is strongly beneficial before suitable thermal conversion. Here we explored the hypothesis that classical destructive methods (proximate, ultimate and compositional analysis) and infrared spectroscopy can discriminate, classify and predict the type of biomass resources, focusing on five biological classes of agriculture residues (stalks, hulls, shells, pits, seed cakes). Proximate and ultimate analysis revealed clustering in tridimensional representation and Van Krevelen diagram. Despite showing distinct spider plot patterns for each class, compositional analysis was less useful for direct discrimination. Instead, sample classes were correctly discriminated by principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. We proposed FTIR as a facile, rapid alternative to classical, destructive methods, which differentiates the biomass residues mainly by the vibration bands of fatty acids and carbohydrates and less by those of lignin. The fine k-nearest neighbors machine learning algorithm applied to FTIR data correctly predicted the class for 96 % of the samples, with 0.94595 validation accuracy, much better than for the destructive methods. Particular features are preserved after torrefaction and pyrolysis, classification of liquid products being the same as the biomass sources. Stepwise pyrolysis can flatten the differences in biomass sources, generating products with more uniform composition. • 21 biomass residues in 5 classes were studied for discrimination and classification. • Proximate, ultimate and compositional analysis methods were compared with FTIR. • Unsupervised PCA and hierarchical clustering provide good class discrimination. • Fine KNN model on FTIR have 0.95 accuracy in class prediction for 96 % of samples. • Classification was confirmed for the torrefaction and pyrolysis products of biomass.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137637
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Source discrimination by classical characterization methods, FTIR and statistical analysis – a prerequisite for thermochemical conversion of agriculture biomass residues by torrefaction and pyrolysis

4 citations
Energy
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.70
article

Source discrimination by classical characterization methods, FTIR and statistical analysis – a prerequisite for thermochemical conversion of agriculture biomass residues by torrefaction and pyrolysis

article en
4 citations

Abstract

The possibility for rapid and facile biomass characterization and classification, including prediction, is strongly beneficial before suitable thermal conversion. Here we explored the hypothesis that classical destructive methods (proximate, ultimate and compositional analysis) and infrared spectroscopy can discriminate, classify and predict the type of biomass resources, focusing on five biological classes of agriculture residues (stalks, hulls, shells, pits, seed cakes). Proximate and ultimate analysis revealed clustering in tridimensional representation and Van Krevelen diagram. Despite showing distinct spider plot patterns for each class, compositional analysis was less useful for direct discrimination. Instead, sample classes were correctly discriminated by principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. We proposed FTIR as a facile, rapid alternative to classical, destructive methods, which differentiates the biomass residues mainly by the vibration bands of fatty acids and carbohydrates and less by those of lignin. The fine k-nearest neighbors machine learning algorithm applied to FTIR data correctly predicted the class for 96 % of the samples, with 0.94595 validation accuracy, much better than for the destructive methods. Particular features are preserved after torrefaction and pyrolysis, classification of liquid products being the same as the biomass sources. Stepwise pyrolysis can flatten the differences in biomass sources, generating products with more uniform composition. • 21 biomass residues in 5 classes were studied for discrimination and classification. • Proximate, ultimate and compositional analysis methods were compared with FTIR. • Unsupervised PCA and hierarchical clustering provide good class discrimination. • Fine KNN model on FTIR have 0.95 accuracy in class prediction for 96 % of samples. • Classification was confirmed for the torrefaction and pyrolysis products of biomass.

EnergyVol. 334
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (MY), Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Source discrimination by classical characterization methods, FTIR and statistical analysis – a prerequisite for thermochemical conversion of agriculture biomass residues by torrefaction and pyrolysis · Energy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS