Comparisonof Conventional Biogas Upgrading Routeand a Direct Methanation System

Traditional biogas upgrading systems focus on producing biomethane by means of carbon dioxide removal. Nevertheless, recent advancements have highlighted the potential for valorizing biogas CO<sub>2</sub> content by methanation without the need for its prior separation. This study compares the performance of a direct methanation system purposely designed to produce high-purity methane suitable for direct injection into a natural gas grid system to those of widely used conventional upgrading technologies, including water scrubbing, chemical absorption with monoethanolamine, membrane separation, and pressure swing adsorption. To this end, detailed mathematical models of the proposed system and conventional biogas upgrading units were developed using the commercial software AspenONE. The system’s performance is compared in terms of methane loss and purity, avoided carbon dioxide emissions, energy efficiency, and levelized cost of biomethane. Biogas direct methanation compares to conventional technologies regarding methane purity (96.96%) and energy efficiency (88%), surpassing them in terms of methane recovery (100%). From an economic perspective, direct methanation exhibited a slightly higher levelized cost of biomethane (0.58 €/Nm<sup>3</sup>) than conventional upgrading techniques, which average around 0.51 €/Nm<sup>3</sup>. As long as excess electric energy from renewable sources is used, biogas upgrading by direct methanation can be considered a technical and economical alternative to conventional upgrading routes.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06247.s001
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisonof Conventional Biogas Upgrading Routeand a Direct Methanation System

Figshare
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Comparisonof Conventional Biogas Upgrading Routeand a Direct Methanation System

article en

Abstract

Traditional biogas upgrading systems focus on producing biomethane by means of carbon dioxide removal. Nevertheless, recent advancements have highlighted the potential for valorizing biogas CO<sub>2</sub> content by methanation without the need for its prior separation. This study compares the performance of a direct methanation system purposely designed to produce high-purity methane suitable for direct injection into a natural gas grid system to those of widely used conventional upgrading technologies, including water scrubbing, chemical absorption with monoethanolamine, membrane separation, and pressure swing adsorption. To this end, detailed mathematical models of the proposed system and conventional biogas upgrading units were developed using the commercial software AspenONE. The system’s performance is compared in terms of methane loss and purity, avoided carbon dioxide emissions, energy efficiency, and levelized cost of biomethane. Biogas direct methanation compares to conventional technologies regarding methane purity (96.96%) and energy efficiency (88%), surpassing them in terms of methane recovery (100%). From an economic perspective, direct methanation exhibited a slightly higher levelized cost of biomethane (0.58 €/Nm<sup>3</sup>) than conventional upgrading techniques, which average around 0.51 €/Nm<sup>3</sup>. As long as excess electric energy from renewable sources is used, biogas upgrading by direct methanation can be considered a technical and economical alternative to conventional upgrading routes.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.