“I Did the Best I Possibly Could”: Factors\nInfluencing Teachers’ Incorporation of Climate Science in High\nSchool Chemistry

Anthropogenic impacts on Earth’s\nclimate are critical issues\nthat necessitate broad public action. Understanding the scientific\nconsensus on climate change is known to correlate to taking actions\nthat combat climate change. K-12 schools serve a key role in providing\npublic education, but high school chemistry teachers have been found\nto minimally incorporate climate change in their courses. Here we\nexplore high school chemistry teachers’ beliefs and practices\nabout incorporating climate change topics. In semistructured interviews,\n10 teachers reported incorporating climate change topics in their\ncourses. These teachers’ approaches to doing so are heavily\nimpacted by their distinct local contexts. Each of these teachers’\ncontext provides a unique set of factors that promote or impede their\nincorporation of climate change topics. Of these teachers, all report\nfinding ways to leverage their available supports to work around the\nbarriers they face, but many report a desire to provide a better education\non climate change. These teachers report logistical barriers that\nprevent them from fully realizing their instructional goals, including\nlack of time, insufficient content knowledge, and lack of suitable\ncurricula. Notably, there is a clear consensus among these teachers\nthat stand-alone curricular modules about climate change topics are\nunsuitable. Rather, they aspire to integrate and blend climate change\neducation throughout their chemistry courses. This highlights a need\nfor flexible curricular resources and individualized professional\ndevelopment to support teachers’ needs in light of their unique\ncontext.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01054.s001
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Did the Best I Possibly Could”: Factors\nInfluencing Teachers’ Incorporation of Climate Science in High\nSchool Chemistry

Figshare
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
article

“I Did the Best I Possibly Could”: Factors\nInfluencing Teachers’ Incorporation of Climate Science in High\nSchool Chemistry

article en

Abstract

Anthropogenic impacts on Earth’s\nclimate are critical issues\nthat necessitate broad public action. Understanding the scientific\nconsensus on climate change is known to correlate to taking actions\nthat combat climate change. K-12 schools serve a key role in providing\npublic education, but high school chemistry teachers have been found\nto minimally incorporate climate change in their courses. Here we\nexplore high school chemistry teachers’ beliefs and practices\nabout incorporating climate change topics. In semistructured interviews,\n10 teachers reported incorporating climate change topics in their\ncourses. These teachers’ approaches to doing so are heavily\nimpacted by their distinct local contexts. Each of these teachers’\ncontext provides a unique set of factors that promote or impede their\nincorporation of climate change topics. Of these teachers, all report\nfinding ways to leverage their available supports to work around the\nbarriers they face, but many report a desire to provide a better education\non climate change. These teachers report logistical barriers that\nprevent them from fully realizing their instructional goals, including\nlack of time, insufficient content knowledge, and lack of suitable\ncurricula. Notably, there is a clear consensus among these teachers\nthat stand-alone curricular modules about climate change topics are\nunsuitable. Rather, they aspire to integrate and blend climate change\neducation throughout their chemistry courses. This highlights a need\nfor flexible curricular resources and individualized professional\ndevelopment to support teachers’ needs in light of their unique\ncontext.

Figshare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“I Did the Best I Possibly Could”: Factors\nInfluencing Teachers’ Incorporation of Climate Science in High\nSchool Chemistry · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS