Geostatistical approach in estimating the capacity volume of the mudflow reservoir

Mudflow reservoirs play a crucial role in mitigating flood risks triggered by natural events like heavy rains and snowmelt, safeguarding surrounding areas from potential inundation. However, sedimentation poses a significant challenge by reducing the capacity and effectiveness of these mudflow reservoirs over time. This study focused on estimating the capacity of the Kalkama mudflow reservoir, constructed in 1987, using a geostatistical approach. Bathymetric survey data were analyzed using various interpolation methods. Kriging (Ordinary Kriging) provided the best performance with the lowest RMSE (0.28) and a high R² (0.99), indicating it is the most accurate method for this dataset. Based on this method, a spatial model of the mudflow reservoir was developed to assess its current capacity. Findings indicate a capacity loss of 2.33 million m³ (23.6%) over 36 years, alongside a 22% reduction in surface area at Full Storage Level, and the dead volume was completely filled with sediment.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459007003/pdf
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geostatistical approach in estimating the capacity volume of the mudflow reservoir

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Geostatistical approach in estimating the capacity volume of the mudflow reservoir

article en

Abstract

Mudflow reservoirs play a crucial role in mitigating flood risks triggered by natural events like heavy rains and snowmelt, safeguarding surrounding areas from potential inundation. However, sedimentation poses a significant challenge by reducing the capacity and effectiveness of these mudflow reservoirs over time. This study focused on estimating the capacity of the Kalkama mudflow reservoir, constructed in 1987, using a geostatistical approach. Bathymetric survey data were analyzed using various interpolation methods. Kriging (Ordinary Kriging) provided the best performance with the lowest RMSE (0.28) and a high R² (0.99), indicating it is the most accurate method for this dataset. Based on this method, a spatial model of the mudflow reservoir was developed to assess its current capacity. Findings indicate a capacity loss of 2.33 million m³ (23.6%) over 36 years, alongside a 22% reduction in surface area at Full Storage Level, and the dead volume was completely filled with sediment.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geostatistical approach in estimating the capacity volume of the mudflow reservoir · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS