Phase Separation\nof CuPd Alloy Nanocatalysts in CO\nOxidation

Alloy nanocatalysts exhibit enhanced activity, selectivity,\nand\nstability mainly due to their versatile phases and atomic structures.\nHowever, nanocatalysts’ “real” functional structures\nmay vary from their as-synthesized status due to the structural and\nchemical changes during the activation and reaction conditions. Herein,\nwe studied the activated CuPd/CeO<sub>2</sub> nanocatalysts under\nthe CO oxidation reaction featuring an atomic-scale phase separation\nprocess, resulting in a notable “hysteresis” in catalyst\nperformance. Through the “identical-location” transmission\nelectron microscopy (TEM) characterization, we found that the CuPd\nnanoparticles (NPs) evolve to a Cu<sub>2</sub>O/CuPd or CuPdO<sub><i>x</i></sub> phase depending on different surface planes\nof CeO<sub>2</sub> supports under the reaction condition. The detailed\ndynamic information is obtained by <i>in situ</i> environmental\nTEM–<i>in situ</i> DRIFTS characterizations to further\ndecouple the effect of pure CO and O<sub>2</sub> gas. The interfacial\nbinding energies between alloy nanoparticles and CeO<sub>2</sub> supports\nare found to play a critical role in determining the phase separation\nbehaviors. These atomic insights highlight the importance of both\nthe phase separation of alloy nanocatalysts and <i>in situ</i> characterizations of “live” catalysts.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c13102.s001
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase Separation\nof CuPd Alloy Nanocatalysts in CO\nOxidation

Figshare
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
article

Phase Separation\nof CuPd Alloy Nanocatalysts in CO\nOxidation

article en

Abstract

Alloy nanocatalysts exhibit enhanced activity, selectivity,\nand\nstability mainly due to their versatile phases and atomic structures.\nHowever, nanocatalysts’ “real” functional structures\nmay vary from their as-synthesized status due to the structural and\nchemical changes during the activation and reaction conditions. Herein,\nwe studied the activated CuPd/CeO<sub>2</sub> nanocatalysts under\nthe CO oxidation reaction featuring an atomic-scale phase separation\nprocess, resulting in a notable “hysteresis” in catalyst\nperformance. Through the “identical-location” transmission\nelectron microscopy (TEM) characterization, we found that the CuPd\nnanoparticles (NPs) evolve to a Cu<sub>2</sub>O/CuPd or CuPdO<sub><i>x</i></sub> phase depending on different surface planes\nof CeO<sub>2</sub> supports under the reaction condition. The detailed\ndynamic information is obtained by <i>in situ</i> environmental\nTEM–<i>in situ</i> DRIFTS characterizations to further\ndecouple the effect of pure CO and O<sub>2</sub> gas. The interfacial\nbinding energies between alloy nanoparticles and CeO<sub>2</sub> supports\nare found to play a critical role in determining the phase separation\nbehaviors. These atomic insights highlight the importance of both\nthe phase separation of alloy nanocatalysts and <i>in situ</i> characterizations of “live” catalysts.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.