China's rise as global scientific powerhouse: A trajectory of international collaboration and specialization in high-impact research

The recent and rapid ascent of China into today's scientific powerhouse is increasingly debated in circles of economic politics and policy making. Yet, we still know relatively little how such rise has materialized in terms of Chinese scientists' openness to international collaborations and relative focus on high-impact research, particularly in relation to the U.S. Leveraging a unique, curated database of over 25 million scientific publications from 2008 until 2020, we aim to fill this gap and empirically investigate: (1) the extent to which collaboration of China-based researchers with scientists from other countries has materialized; (2) how competition in producing high-impact research has evolved for China, especially vis-à-vis the U.S., in the global production of science; and (3) whether specialization in well-defined fields has characterized China's ascent in science and, if so, in which areas. Our findings show that China's rise as a leading player in global science has importantly built on opening its knowledge production to collaboration, both domestically and internationally. This has been paired with a remarkable focus on high-impact research. Recently, China has entirely closed the gap with the U.S. in terms of contribution to the global top 1 % high-impact scientific production, specializing in four key fields – engineering/electrical/electronic, materials science, physics, and chemistry. Our study sheds new light on the changing landscape of global scientific production and opens several avenues for future research. • China has entirely closed the gap with the U.S. in terms of global production of scientific knowledge • China-based researchers have increased their openness to scientific collaborations, both domestically and internationally • China's specialization has focused on engineering/electrical/electronic, materials science, physics, and chemistry

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105288
Citations
3
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China's rise as global scientific powerhouse: A trajectory of international collaboration and specialization in high-impact research

3 citations
Research Policy
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
4.20
article

China's rise as global scientific powerhouse: A trajectory of international collaboration and specialization in high-impact research

article en
3 citations

Abstract

The recent and rapid ascent of China into today's scientific powerhouse is increasingly debated in circles of economic politics and policy making. Yet, we still know relatively little how such rise has materialized in terms of Chinese scientists' openness to international collaborations and relative focus on high-impact research, particularly in relation to the U.S. Leveraging a unique, curated database of over 25 million scientific publications from 2008 until 2020, we aim to fill this gap and empirically investigate: (1) the extent to which collaboration of China-based researchers with scientists from other countries has materialized; (2) how competition in producing high-impact research has evolved for China, especially vis-à-vis the U.S., in the global production of science; and (3) whether specialization in well-defined fields has characterized China's ascent in science and, if so, in which areas. Our findings show that China's rise as a leading player in global science has importantly built on opening its knowledge production to collaboration, both domestically and internationally. This has been paired with a remarkable focus on high-impact research. Recently, China has entirely closed the gap with the U.S. in terms of contribution to the global top 1 % high-impact scientific production, specializing in four key fields – engineering/electrical/electronic, materials science, physics, and chemistry. Our study sheds new light on the changing landscape of global scientific production and opens several avenues for future research. • China has entirely closed the gap with the U.S. in terms of global production of scientific knowledge • China-based researchers have increased their openness to scientific collaborations, both domestically and internationally • China's specialization has focused on engineering/electrical/electronic, materials science, physics, and chemistry

Research PolicyVol. 54(8)
Leiden University (NL), International Institute for Management Development (CH), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.