Reaction Mechanismand Kinetic Model of the Transformationof Iron Monosulfide Thin Films into Pyrite Films

This work presents a comprehensive reaction and kinetic model of the pyrite thin films formation by sulfuration of Fe monosulfides when a molecular sulfur (S<sub>2</sub>) atmosphere is used. This investigation completes the results already published on the explanation and interpretation of the sulfuration process that transforms metallic iron into pyrite. It was previously shown that the monosulfide species (i.e., orthorhombic and hexagonal pyrrhotite phases) are intermediate phases in the sulfuration reaction. Based on experimental data we now show that the sulfuration of pyrrhotite to pyrite takes place in two distinct stages: (i) conversion of orthorhombic pyrrhotite to pyrite (Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S<sup>O</sup> → FeS<sub>2</sub>) while the hexagonal pyrrhotite (Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S<sup>H</sup>) phase remains unaltered, and (ii) final transformation of hexagonal pyrrhotite to pyrite (Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S<sup>H</sup> → FeS<sub>2</sub>). Both processes occur via interstitial sulfur diffusion through the previously formed pyrrhotite layer. Consequently, the monosulfide is sulfurated at the internal Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S/FeS<sub>2</sub> interface. The reaction mechanism at each stage has been validated using the corresponding kinetic model to fit the experimental data on time evolution of Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S and FeS<sub>2</sub> layers thicknesses and some of the film transport properties. The concluding global reaction mechanism proposed in some of our former papers and completed here (Fe → Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S → FeS<sub>2</sub>) can explain the resulting microstructure of the pyrite films (i.e., Kirkendall effect and formation of a porous layer in the film). Simultaneously, it also justifies the presence of intrinsic defects, such as iron and sulfur vacancies, and the accumulation of interstitial sulfur at the film grain boundaries. The conductivity of pyrite films is tentatively explained using a two-band model where the changes in the Seebeck coefficient and the S/Fe ratio during the pyrite recrystallization stage can be successfully explained.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08227.s001
Primary Topic
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reaction Mechanismand Kinetic Model of the Transformationof Iron Monosulfide Thin Films into Pyrite Films

Figshare
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
article

Reaction Mechanismand Kinetic Model of the Transformationof Iron Monosulfide Thin Films into Pyrite Films

article en

Abstract

This work presents a comprehensive reaction and kinetic model of the pyrite thin films formation by sulfuration of Fe monosulfides when a molecular sulfur (S<sub>2</sub>) atmosphere is used. This investigation completes the results already published on the explanation and interpretation of the sulfuration process that transforms metallic iron into pyrite. It was previously shown that the monosulfide species (i.e., orthorhombic and hexagonal pyrrhotite phases) are intermediate phases in the sulfuration reaction. Based on experimental data we now show that the sulfuration of pyrrhotite to pyrite takes place in two distinct stages: (i) conversion of orthorhombic pyrrhotite to pyrite (Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S<sup>O</sup> → FeS<sub>2</sub>) while the hexagonal pyrrhotite (Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S<sup>H</sup>) phase remains unaltered, and (ii) final transformation of hexagonal pyrrhotite to pyrite (Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S<sup>H</sup> → FeS<sub>2</sub>). Both processes occur via interstitial sulfur diffusion through the previously formed pyrrhotite layer. Consequently, the monosulfide is sulfurated at the internal Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S/FeS<sub>2</sub> interface. The reaction mechanism at each stage has been validated using the corresponding kinetic model to fit the experimental data on time evolution of Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S and FeS<sub>2</sub> layers thicknesses and some of the film transport properties. The concluding global reaction mechanism proposed in some of our former papers and completed here (Fe → Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>S → FeS<sub>2</sub>) can explain the resulting microstructure of the pyrite films (i.e., Kirkendall effect and formation of a porous layer in the film). Simultaneously, it also justifies the presence of intrinsic defects, such as iron and sulfur vacancies, and the accumulation of interstitial sulfur at the film grain boundaries. The conductivity of pyrite films is tentatively explained using a two-band model where the changes in the Seebeck coefficient and the S/Fe ratio during the pyrite recrystallization stage can be successfully explained.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.