Effectsof Bottom-Hole Pressure on Energy Recoveryfrom Three-Phase Hydrate-Bearing Sediments with Underlying Free-GasReservoir via Depressurization

Methane hydrates are considered as the future clean energy resource. Geological exploration results indicate that the symbiosis of underlying gas is a typical characterization of natural gas hydrate (NGH) reservoirs. Co-production from NGH reservoir and underlying gas reservoir shows significant potential for future commercial production. However, the fluid production, thermal response, and sediment displacement evolution during co-production are still unclear and warrant investigation. In this study, we synthesized three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments with hydrate saturations of 12.0 and 26.0% at 15.0 °C and prepared the underlying gas reservoir with gas saturation of 87.7% at 17.5 °C. Fluid production and evolution of temperature and sediment displacement were examined during depressurization from the underlying gas reservoir under four bottom-hole pressures, <i>i.e.,</i> 8.0, 6.0, 4.0, and 2.0 MPa. A novel quantification method was developed for estimation of gas and water production from each reservoir. By lowering bottom-hole pressure from 8.0 to 2.0 MPa, gas recovery ratio increased by nearly 30% in both cases. Water production was significantly delayed compared with gas production and only started when water saturation of underlying gas reservoir reached above 40% in all cases. Increasing <i>S</i><sub>H</sub> from 12.0 to 26.0% result in a decrease in the minimum temperature of three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments from 7.5 °C to 2.5 °C. Displacement sensor monitors the downward displacement of the three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments during depressurization. The volume strain increases from 0.12 to 0.38% when decreasing BHP, while that for low <i>S</i><sub>H</sub> only increases 0.06%. Our findings expand the understanding of fluid production behaviour from three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments with underlying gas. It provides guidance in the optimization of producion strategy for future field-scale co-production tests.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00213.s001
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectsof Bottom-Hole Pressure on Energy Recoveryfrom Three-Phase Hydrate-Bearing Sediments with Underlying Free-GasReservoir via Depressurization

Figshare
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Effectsof Bottom-Hole Pressure on Energy Recoveryfrom Three-Phase Hydrate-Bearing Sediments with Underlying Free-GasReservoir via Depressurization

article en

Abstract

Methane hydrates are considered as the future clean energy resource. Geological exploration results indicate that the symbiosis of underlying gas is a typical characterization of natural gas hydrate (NGH) reservoirs. Co-production from NGH reservoir and underlying gas reservoir shows significant potential for future commercial production. However, the fluid production, thermal response, and sediment displacement evolution during co-production are still unclear and warrant investigation. In this study, we synthesized three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments with hydrate saturations of 12.0 and 26.0% at 15.0 °C and prepared the underlying gas reservoir with gas saturation of 87.7% at 17.5 °C. Fluid production and evolution of temperature and sediment displacement were examined during depressurization from the underlying gas reservoir under four bottom-hole pressures, <i>i.e.,</i> 8.0, 6.0, 4.0, and 2.0 MPa. A novel quantification method was developed for estimation of gas and water production from each reservoir. By lowering bottom-hole pressure from 8.0 to 2.0 MPa, gas recovery ratio increased by nearly 30% in both cases. Water production was significantly delayed compared with gas production and only started when water saturation of underlying gas reservoir reached above 40% in all cases. Increasing <i>S</i><sub>H</sub> from 12.0 to 26.0% result in a decrease in the minimum temperature of three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments from 7.5 °C to 2.5 °C. Displacement sensor monitors the downward displacement of the three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments during depressurization. The volume strain increases from 0.12 to 0.38% when decreasing BHP, while that for low <i>S</i><sub>H</sub> only increases 0.06%. Our findings expand the understanding of fluid production behaviour from three-phase methane hydrate-bearing sediments with underlying gas. It provides guidance in the optimization of producion strategy for future field-scale co-production tests.

Figshare
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effectsof Bottom-Hole Pressure on Energy Recoveryfrom Three-Phase Hydrate-Bearing Sediments with Underlying Free-GasReservoir via Depressurization · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS