Predicting ThermodynamicStability at Protein G Siteswith Deleterious Mutations Using λ‑Dynamics with CompetitiveScreening

Free energy predictions are useful in protein design and computer-aided drug design. Alchemical free energy methods are highly accurate, and the alchemical method λ-dynamics significantly improves computational cost. Recent progress made simulations of dozens of perturbations at a single site possible, enabling <i>in silico</i> site-saturation mutagenesis with λ-dynamics. Site-saturation mutagenesis may require increased sampling to characterize many mutations and to accommodate structural disruptions around deleterious mutations. We reintroduce the neglected idea of competitive screening with λ-dynamics to address both issues. Traditional landscape flattening tunes two distinct biases to sample all mutations equally in the folded and unfolded states. Competitive screening transfers the unfolded bias to the folded state so that only reasonable mutations are sampled. Competitive screening is demonstrated on four surface sites and four buried sites in protein G and provides improvements for buried sites. Consequently, competitive screening provides new opportunities for molecular design within larger chemical spaces.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00260.s001
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting ThermodynamicStability at Protein G Siteswith Deleterious Mutations Using λ‑Dynamics with CompetitiveScreening

Figshare
Protein Structure and Dynamics
article

Predicting ThermodynamicStability at Protein G Siteswith Deleterious Mutations Using λ‑Dynamics with CompetitiveScreening

article en

Abstract

Free energy predictions are useful in protein design and computer-aided drug design. Alchemical free energy methods are highly accurate, and the alchemical method λ-dynamics significantly improves computational cost. Recent progress made simulations of dozens of perturbations at a single site possible, enabling <i>in silico</i> site-saturation mutagenesis with λ-dynamics. Site-saturation mutagenesis may require increased sampling to characterize many mutations and to accommodate structural disruptions around deleterious mutations. We reintroduce the neglected idea of competitive screening with λ-dynamics to address both issues. Traditional landscape flattening tunes two distinct biases to sample all mutations equally in the folded and unfolded states. Competitive screening transfers the unfolded bias to the folded state so that only reasonable mutations are sampled. Competitive screening is demonstrated on four surface sites and four buried sites in protein G and provides improvements for buried sites. Consequently, competitive screening provides new opportunities for molecular design within larger chemical spaces.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predicting ThermodynamicStability at Protein G Siteswith Deleterious Mutations Using λ‑Dynamics with CompetitiveScreening · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS