Environmental Inequality\nin Estimated Cancer Risk\nfrom Airborne Toxic Exposure across United States Communities from\n2011 to 2019

US Census Bureau data were matched to U.S. Environmental\nProtection\nAgency estimated cancer risks from airborne toxics from 2011 to 2019\nto explore environmental inequality with nationwide census tract resolution.\nSpearman correlations showed modest associations between various socioeconomic\nstatus factors and estimated cancer risk. Multiple linear regression\nanalyses show positive associations with increased estimated cancer\nrisk (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for high proportions of Blacks\nin suburban and rural areas. A positive relationship with estimated\ncancer risk was found for increasing proportions of Asians and Hispanics\nin nonurban areas. Urban tracts that suffer from the highest estimated\ncancer risks were concentrated among the communities with a population\nof higher proportion of minorities. While environmental inequality\nseems to have improved across the examined years for certain demographics\nwith respect to estimated cancer risk from air toxics, equity is far\nfrom achieved, and future work in identifying the sources of environmental\ninequality could help in achieving a more just environment.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c02526.s002
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Inequality\nin Estimated Cancer Risk\nfrom Airborne Toxic Exposure across United States Communities from\n2011 to 2019

Figshare
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Environmental Inequality\nin Estimated Cancer Risk\nfrom Airborne Toxic Exposure across United States Communities from\n2011 to 2019

article en

Abstract

US Census Bureau data were matched to U.S. Environmental\nProtection\nAgency estimated cancer risks from airborne toxics from 2011 to 2019\nto explore environmental inequality with nationwide census tract resolution.\nSpearman correlations showed modest associations between various socioeconomic\nstatus factors and estimated cancer risk. Multiple linear regression\nanalyses show positive associations with increased estimated cancer\nrisk (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for high proportions of Blacks\nin suburban and rural areas. A positive relationship with estimated\ncancer risk was found for increasing proportions of Asians and Hispanics\nin nonurban areas. Urban tracts that suffer from the highest estimated\ncancer risks were concentrated among the communities with a population\nof higher proportion of minorities. While environmental inequality\nseems to have improved across the examined years for certain demographics\nwith respect to estimated cancer risk from air toxics, equity is far\nfrom achieved, and future work in identifying the sources of environmental\ninequality could help in achieving a more just environment.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental Inequality\nin Estimated Cancer Risk\nfrom Airborne Toxic Exposure across United States Communities from\n2011 to 2019 · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS