How Do DNA Molecular\nSprings Modulate Protein–Protein\nInteractions: Experimental and Theoretical Results

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) nanomachines have been widely\nexploited\nin enzyme activity regulation, protein crystallization, protein assembly,\nand control of the protein–protein interaction (PPI). Yet,\nthe fundamental biophysical framework of DNA nanomachines in the case\nof regulating protein–protein interactions remains elusive.\nHere, we established a DNA nanospring-mCherry model with mCherry homodimers\nof different <i>K</i><sub>d</sub>. Using size exclusion\nchromatography and fluorescence polarization, we profiled the DNA\nnanospring-mediated manipulation of PPI as an entropy-reducing process.\nThe energy transfer efficiency was a function of the length of the\ncomplementary sequence and the geometry of the DNA nanospring construction.\nWith basic force analysis and physical chemistry calculation, we proposed\na unified model of the correlation between the dissociation constant,\nlocal concentration, construction of DNA nanospring, and kinetics\nof protein dimerization. Overall, we demonstrated that the DNA nanospring-mCherry\nconjugate was a simple and practical model to analyze DNA-controlled\nprotein–protein interaction.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00280.s001
Primary Topic
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do DNA Molecular\nSprings Modulate Protein–Protein\nInteractions: Experimental and Theoretical Results

Figshare
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
article

How Do DNA Molecular\nSprings Modulate Protein–Protein\nInteractions: Experimental and Theoretical Results

article en

Abstract

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) nanomachines have been widely\nexploited\nin enzyme activity regulation, protein crystallization, protein assembly,\nand control of the protein–protein interaction (PPI). Yet,\nthe fundamental biophysical framework of DNA nanomachines in the case\nof regulating protein–protein interactions remains elusive.\nHere, we established a DNA nanospring-mCherry model with mCherry homodimers\nof different <i>K</i><sub>d</sub>. Using size exclusion\nchromatography and fluorescence polarization, we profiled the DNA\nnanospring-mediated manipulation of PPI as an entropy-reducing process.\nThe energy transfer efficiency was a function of the length of the\ncomplementary sequence and the geometry of the DNA nanospring construction.\nWith basic force analysis and physical chemistry calculation, we proposed\na unified model of the correlation between the dissociation constant,\nlocal concentration, construction of DNA nanospring, and kinetics\nof protein dimerization. Overall, we demonstrated that the DNA nanospring-mCherry\nconjugate was a simple and practical model to analyze DNA-controlled\nprotein–protein interaction.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Do DNA Molecular\nSprings Modulate Protein–Protein\nInteractions: Experimental and Theoretical Results · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS