Nucleoprotein\nPhase-Separation Affinities Revealed\nvia Atomistic Simulations of Short Peptide and RNA Fragments

Liquid–liquid phase separation of proteins and\nnucleic acids\ninto condensate phases is a versatile mechanism for ensuring the compartmentalization\nof cellular biochemistry. RNA molecules play critical roles in these\ncondensates, particularly in transcriptional regulation and stress\nresponses, exhibiting a wide range of thermodynamic and dynamic behaviors.\nHowever, deciphering the molecular grammar that governs the stability\nand dynamics of protein–RNA condensates remains challenging\ndue to the multicomponent and heterogeneous nature of condensates.\nIn this study, we employ atomistic simulations of 20 distinct mixtures\ncontaining minimal RNA and peptide fragments which allows us to dissect\nthe phase-separating affinities of all 20 amino acids in the presence\nof RNA. Our findings elucidate chemically specific interactions, hydration\nprofiles, and ionic effects that synergistically promote or suppress\nprotein–RNA phase separation. We map a ternary phase diagram\nof interactions, identifying four distinct groups of residues that\npromote, maintain, suppress, and disrupt protein–RNA clusters.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02654.s001
Primary Topic
RNA Research and Splicing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nucleoprotein\nPhase-Separation Affinities Revealed\nvia Atomistic Simulations of Short Peptide and RNA Fragments

Figshare
RNA Research and Splicing
article

Nucleoprotein\nPhase-Separation Affinities Revealed\nvia Atomistic Simulations of Short Peptide and RNA Fragments

article en

Abstract

Liquid–liquid phase separation of proteins and\nnucleic acids\ninto condensate phases is a versatile mechanism for ensuring the compartmentalization\nof cellular biochemistry. RNA molecules play critical roles in these\ncondensates, particularly in transcriptional regulation and stress\nresponses, exhibiting a wide range of thermodynamic and dynamic behaviors.\nHowever, deciphering the molecular grammar that governs the stability\nand dynamics of protein–RNA condensates remains challenging\ndue to the multicomponent and heterogeneous nature of condensates.\nIn this study, we employ atomistic simulations of 20 distinct mixtures\ncontaining minimal RNA and peptide fragments which allows us to dissect\nthe phase-separating affinities of all 20 amino acids in the presence\nof RNA. Our findings elucidate chemically specific interactions, hydration\nprofiles, and ionic effects that synergistically promote or suppress\nprotein–RNA phase separation. We map a ternary phase diagram\nof interactions, identifying four distinct groups of residues that\npromote, maintain, suppress, and disrupt protein–RNA clusters.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
RNA Research and Splicing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nucleoprotein\nPhase-Separation Affinities Revealed\nvia Atomistic Simulations of Short Peptide and RNA Fragments · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS