Differences in Performance\namong ECPs with Different\nMetal Centers Based on Highly Stable TzTO

The stability and detonation properties of energetic\ncoordination\npolymers (ECPs) are usually directly related to the selection of ligands.\nHowever, different metals and ligands may form different structures,\nwhich will greatly affect the stability and detonation performance\nof ECPs. Three-dimensional (3D) energetic metal–organic frameworks\n(EMOFs) usually exhibit enhanced energetic performances and modest\nstability compared with one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D)\nECPs. In this work, an energetic internal salt H<sub>2</sub>TzTO (5-(1<i>H</i>-1,2,4-triazol-4-ium-3-yl)-1<i>H</i>-tetrazol-1-olate)\nwith high stability was selected as the ligand and coordinated with\nfour metal centers, Na(I), K(I), Co(II), and Ni(II), to form three\nECPs, named [Na(HTzTO)(H<sub>2</sub>O)]<sub><i>n</i></sub>·0.5H<sub>2</sub>O, Co(HTzTO)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>, and Ni(HTzTO)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O, and one EMOF [K(HTzTO)]<sub><i>n</i></sub>, respectively.\nThe four compounds showed excellent thermal stability [decomposition\ntemperature (<i>T</i><sub>d</sub>) ≥ 263 °C]\nand detonation properties [detonation velocity (<i>D</i>) ≥ 8587 m·s–<sup>1</sup> and detonation pressure\n(<i>P</i>) ≥ 33.8 GPa], but their properties are\ndifferent due to the influence of the metal center and structure.\nAmong them, [K(HTzTO)]<sub><i>n</i></sub> and Co(HTzTO)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub> exhibit surprising thermal stability\n(<i>T</i><sub>d</sub> = 344 and 347 °C, respectively)\ndue to the formation of face-to-face π–π stacking\nin their structures, which greatly enhances the stability of the molecules.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.4c00341.s001
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Performance\namong ECPs with Different\nMetal Centers Based on Highly Stable TzTO

Figshare
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

Differences in Performance\namong ECPs with Different\nMetal Centers Based on Highly Stable TzTO

article en

Abstract

The stability and detonation properties of energetic\ncoordination\npolymers (ECPs) are usually directly related to the selection of ligands.\nHowever, different metals and ligands may form different structures,\nwhich will greatly affect the stability and detonation performance\nof ECPs. Three-dimensional (3D) energetic metal–organic frameworks\n(EMOFs) usually exhibit enhanced energetic performances and modest\nstability compared with one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D)\nECPs. In this work, an energetic internal salt H<sub>2</sub>TzTO (5-(1<i>H</i>-1,2,4-triazol-4-ium-3-yl)-1<i>H</i>-tetrazol-1-olate)\nwith high stability was selected as the ligand and coordinated with\nfour metal centers, Na(I), K(I), Co(II), and Ni(II), to form three\nECPs, named [Na(HTzTO)(H<sub>2</sub>O)]<sub><i>n</i></sub>·0.5H<sub>2</sub>O, Co(HTzTO)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>, and Ni(HTzTO)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O, and one EMOF [K(HTzTO)]<sub><i>n</i></sub>, respectively.\nThe four compounds showed excellent thermal stability [decomposition\ntemperature (<i>T</i><sub>d</sub>) ≥ 263 °C]\nand detonation properties [detonation velocity (<i>D</i>) ≥ 8587 m·s–<sup>1</sup> and detonation pressure\n(<i>P</i>) ≥ 33.8 GPa], but their properties are\ndifferent due to the influence of the metal center and structure.\nAmong them, [K(HTzTO)]<sub><i>n</i></sub> and Co(HTzTO)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub> exhibit surprising thermal stability\n(<i>T</i><sub>d</sub> = 344 and 347 °C, respectively)\ndue to the formation of face-to-face π–π stacking\nin their structures, which greatly enhances the stability of the molecules.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.