Bulk and Interfacial\nBehavior of Potato Protein-Based\nMicrogels

This study aims to understand the bulk and interfacial\nperformance\nof potato protein microgels. Potato protein (PoP) was used to produce\nmicrogels of submicrometer diameter via a top-down approach of thermal\ncross-linking followed by high-shear homogenization of the bulk gel.\nBulk “parent” gels were formed at protein concentrations\n[PoP] = 5–18 wt %, which subsequently varied in their bulk\nshear elastic modulus (<i>G</i>′) by several orders\nof magnitude (1–100 kPa), <i>G</i>′ increasing\nwith increasing [PoP]. The PoP microgels (PoPM) formed from these\nparent gels had diameters varying between 100 and 300 nm (size increasing\nwith increasing <i>G</i>′ and [PoP]), as observed\nvia dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy (AFM) of\nPoPM adsorbed onto silicon. Interfacial rheology (interfacial shear\nstorage and loss moduli, <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>′ and <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>″) and interfacial tension (γ) of adsorbed films of\nPoP (i.e., nonheated PoP) and PoPM (both at tetradecane–water\ninterfaces) were also studied, as well as the bulk rheology of the\nPoPM dispersions. The results showed that PoPM dispersions (at 50\nvol %) had significantly higher bulk viscosity and shear thinning\nproperties compared to the nonmicrogelled PoP at the same overall\n[PoP], but the bulk rheological behavior was in sharp contrast to\nthe interfacial rheological performance, where <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>′ and <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>″ of PoP were higher than for any of the PoPM.\nThis suggests that the deformability and size of the microgels were\nkey in determining the interfacial rheology of the PoPM. These findings\nmay be attributed to the limited capacity for “unfolding”\nand lateral interactions of the larger PoPM at the interface, which\nare presumed to be stiffer due to their production from the strongest\nPoP gels. Our study further confirmed that heating and cooling the\nadsorbed films of PoPM after their adsorption showed little change,\nhighlighting that hydrogen bonding was limited between the microgel\nparticles.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c01785.s001
Primary Topic
Proteins in Food Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bulk and Interfacial\nBehavior of Potato Protein-Based\nMicrogels

Figshare
Proteins in Food Systems
article

Bulk and Interfacial\nBehavior of Potato Protein-Based\nMicrogels

article en

Abstract

This study aims to understand the bulk and interfacial\nperformance\nof potato protein microgels. Potato protein (PoP) was used to produce\nmicrogels of submicrometer diameter via a top-down approach of thermal\ncross-linking followed by high-shear homogenization of the bulk gel.\nBulk “parent” gels were formed at protein concentrations\n[PoP] = 5–18 wt %, which subsequently varied in their bulk\nshear elastic modulus (<i>G</i>′) by several orders\nof magnitude (1–100 kPa), <i>G</i>′ increasing\nwith increasing [PoP]. The PoP microgels (PoPM) formed from these\nparent gels had diameters varying between 100 and 300 nm (size increasing\nwith increasing <i>G</i>′ and [PoP]), as observed\nvia dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy (AFM) of\nPoPM adsorbed onto silicon. Interfacial rheology (interfacial shear\nstorage and loss moduli, <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>′ and <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>″) and interfacial tension (γ) of adsorbed films of\nPoP (i.e., nonheated PoP) and PoPM (both at tetradecane–water\ninterfaces) were also studied, as well as the bulk rheology of the\nPoPM dispersions. The results showed that PoPM dispersions (at 50\nvol %) had significantly higher bulk viscosity and shear thinning\nproperties compared to the nonmicrogelled PoP at the same overall\n[PoP], but the bulk rheological behavior was in sharp contrast to\nthe interfacial rheological performance, where <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>′ and <i>G</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>″ of PoP were higher than for any of the PoPM.\nThis suggests that the deformability and size of the microgels were\nkey in determining the interfacial rheology of the PoPM. These findings\nmay be attributed to the limited capacity for “unfolding”\nand lateral interactions of the larger PoPM at the interface, which\nare presumed to be stiffer due to their production from the strongest\nPoP gels. Our study further confirmed that heating and cooling the\nadsorbed films of PoPM after their adsorption showed little change,\nhighlighting that hydrogen bonding was limited between the microgel\nparticles.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Proteins in Food Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bulk and Interfacial\nBehavior of Potato Protein-Based\nMicrogels · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS