Artificial Intelligence: Redefining Intellectual Property Frameworks and Ethical Boundaries in an Era of Innovation

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across diverse sectors, fromcreative industries to employment, raises questions about whether our currentintellectual property (IP) laws can govern and regulate AI-generated content.Copyright and patent law are two IP law frameworks designed to protect creativeworks and inventions made by humans. As AI is being used to create new worksand inventions, the IP law framework faces challenges in ownership andeligibility for legal protection. In Thaler v Hirshfeld (2021), the court ruled thatAI cannot be recognized as an inventor under the Patent Act. This decisionhighlights the hesitation to protect AI-generated works and the rigidity in ourhuman-based IP law frameworks. From hiring decisions to pornographic imagemanipulation, AI also poses ethical and privacy concerns. The use of AI inalgorithmic decision-making systems and deepfakes exposes how thesetechnologies can be used to discriminate against or manipulate individuals. Whilelaws have been introduced to protect individuals against AI-based discriminationand deepfakes, there is still a need for cohesive federal law to safeguard peoplefrom systematic bias and those who employ AI to cause harm.

Publication Details

Journal
Washington University in St. Louis Libraries
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7936/wuulr.9079
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence: Redefining Intellectual Property Frameworks and Ethical Boundaries in an Era of Innovation

Washington University in St. Louis Libraries
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Artificial Intelligence: Redefining Intellectual Property Frameworks and Ethical Boundaries in an Era of Innovation

article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across diverse sectors, fromcreative industries to employment, raises questions about whether our currentintellectual property (IP) laws can govern and regulate AI-generated content.Copyright and patent law are two IP law frameworks designed to protect creativeworks and inventions made by humans. As AI is being used to create new worksand inventions, the IP law framework faces challenges in ownership andeligibility for legal protection. In Thaler v Hirshfeld (2021), the court ruled thatAI cannot be recognized as an inventor under the Patent Act. This decisionhighlights the hesitation to protect AI-generated works and the rigidity in ourhuman-based IP law frameworks. From hiring decisions to pornographic imagemanipulation, AI also poses ethical and privacy concerns. The use of AI inalgorithmic decision-making systems and deepfakes exposes how thesetechnologies can be used to discriminate against or manipulate individuals. Whilelaws have been introduced to protect individuals against AI-based discriminationand deepfakes, there is still a need for cohesive federal law to safeguard peoplefrom systematic bias and those who employ AI to cause harm.

Washington University in St. Louis Libraries
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence: Redefining Intellectual Property Frameworks and Ethical Boundaries in an Era of Innovation · Washington University in St. Louis Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS