Comparison of Reactive\nDistillation Packings Used\nfor 1‑Butene Isomerization

The reactive distillation process of 1-butene isomerization\nis\nan important technique for utilizing abundant C4 hydrocarbons, and\nusing proper reactive distillation packings is critical to the performance\nof this process. Herein, two typical packings are compared in terms\nof hydrodynamic properties and reaction-separation performance for\n1-butene isomerization. Compared to Katapak packing, the dynamic liquid\nholdup of Lummus packing is less sensitive to the change of liquid\nflow density and gas-phase kinetic energy factor, and its wet pressure\ndrop is lower at high gas and liquid flow rates. These differences\nin hydrodynamic properties can be attributed to the higher void fraction\nand larger flow channels of Lummus packing and indicate that Lummus\npacking is better in operational flexibility. The simulations show\nthat using Katapak in the reactive distillation column yields higher\n1-butene conversion and 2-butene purity in the product, indicating\nthat Katapak is better in the reaction-separation performance. This\ncan be attributed to the higher catalyst filling capacity and larger\nspecific surface area of Katapak. These results should serve to guide\nthe selection and design of reactive distillation packings for 1-butene\nisomerization.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02605.s001
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Reactive\nDistillation Packings Used\nfor 1‑Butene Isomerization

Figshare
Process Optimization and Integration
article

Comparison of Reactive\nDistillation Packings Used\nfor 1‑Butene Isomerization

article en

Abstract

The reactive distillation process of 1-butene isomerization\nis\nan important technique for utilizing abundant C4 hydrocarbons, and\nusing proper reactive distillation packings is critical to the performance\nof this process. Herein, two typical packings are compared in terms\nof hydrodynamic properties and reaction-separation performance for\n1-butene isomerization. Compared to Katapak packing, the dynamic liquid\nholdup of Lummus packing is less sensitive to the change of liquid\nflow density and gas-phase kinetic energy factor, and its wet pressure\ndrop is lower at high gas and liquid flow rates. These differences\nin hydrodynamic properties can be attributed to the higher void fraction\nand larger flow channels of Lummus packing and indicate that Lummus\npacking is better in operational flexibility. The simulations show\nthat using Katapak in the reactive distillation column yields higher\n1-butene conversion and 2-butene purity in the product, indicating\nthat Katapak is better in the reaction-separation performance. This\ncan be attributed to the higher catalyst filling capacity and larger\nspecific surface area of Katapak. These results should serve to guide\nthe selection and design of reactive distillation packings for 1-butene\nisomerization.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Process Optimization and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.